====================================================
WASHINGTON EXPOSED AS SECRETLY FINANCING AL-QAEDA
PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA DEMANDS PAYMENT OF THE SETTLEMENTS
Wednesday 3 December 2008 02:30
BIGGEST TERRORISM SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY UNFOLDING BEFORE OUR EYES
SECRET ROOM INSIDE MORGAN STANLEY FUNDING AL-QAEDA AND GLOBAL TERRORISM
COVER-UP OPERATIONS 'BLOWN': WASHINGTON HAS BEEN FINANCING GLOBAL TERROR
NOW WE KNOW WHY THESE SNAKES HAVE BEEN WRIGGLING, SPITTING AND SQUIRMING
INCOMING U.S. PRESIDENT BRIEFED BY C.I.A. IMMEDIATELY AFTER MCCAIN
CONCEDED
INTERFERENCE WITH COMMUNICATIONS BY FORT MEADE FAILS TO KEEP LID ON
SCANDAL
OBAMA HORRIFIED AND DISGUSTED AT WHAT HE FOUND OUT. ANGRY WITH BIDEN,
TOO.
EVEN SO, BUSH TRIED TO BRIBE BARACK OBAMA WHEN HE VISITED THE WHITE
HOUSE
BUSH CRIMINALISTS WARNED: 'YOU TOUCH OBAMA AND YOU REALLY ARE DEAD MEAT'
WASHINGTON PIGS DEMAND THE RIGHT TO STICK THEIR NOSES IN THE TROUGH
FIRST
DEMANDING PAYMENT TO THEIR 'FOUNDATIONS' FOR CORRUPT 'SERVICES RENDERED'
PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA ADVISED THAT HE MAY HAVE TO ASSUME POWER EARLY
BUSH JR. SLOW-HAND-CLAPPED BY G-20 DELEGATES WHEN HE WALKED OUT IN A
HUFF
TRIED TO SELL THE AMERO SCAM TO THE JADED G-20 MEETING, AND WAS REBUFFED
DUPLICITOUS GORDON BROWN HAD BEEN SECRETLY IMPEDING THE SETTLEMENTS
OBAMA SENT AN EMISSARY TO TELL BROWN TO CEASE AND DESIST OR BE ARRESTED
OBAMA WORKING IN 'LOCK-STEP' WITH SARKOZY AND MI6 TO PUT THINGS IN ORDER
ROBERT RUBIN SECRETLY SUPERVISED DIVERSION OF KEY FUNDS TO ATHENS,
GREECE
NO WAY GEITHNER COULD NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THESE SCANDALS AND CORRUPTION
MUST HAVE KNOWN, TOO, ABOUT THE CRIMS' SECRET BANK ACCOUNTS AT CITIBANK
TONY BLAIR'S DEVASTATING 'ROLLOVER' TESTIMONY HAS SET EVERYTHING ABLAZE
BLAIR AND BUSH, 'VIA ECCLESTONE', SET UP LONDON AS FRAUDULENT FINANCE
CENTRE
THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IS BREAKING DOWN AS CREDIT INSURANCE IS PULLED
BRITAIN AND AMERICA HOVERING ON THE BRINK OF A DEPRESSION, AS WE
PREDICTED
BUSH SR. SHIPPED PRINTING PLATES TO SADDAM: AT 'SWITCH', HAD TO
RETRIEVE THEM
By
Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency
Review and associated intelligence publications and information
services. See this site for details and ordering facility.
.............................................................
Advertisement:...(...)
.................................................................................................
•
INTERNATIONAL
CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, all 972 pages of it, is
making waves all over the world. It contains a blow-by-blow
deconstruction of this crisis via the Wantagate plus our further
analyses: and everything published therein is now well and truly ON THE
GLOBAL PUBLIC RECORD. Accordingly the whole world owns a detailed,
damning account of the serial criminality of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton
'Box Gang' et al., which CANNOT BE EXPUNGED.
•
INTERNATIONAL
CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, Number 1, consisting of some 400 pages, WAS
DISTRIBUTED BY FAST MAIL TO SUBSCRIBERS WORLDWIDE ON 29TH NOVEMBER
2008...
•
It tracks the fallout from our exposures of the
criminality from mid-April 2008 to 6th October 2008, when this issue of
ICR had to go to press. The Glossary that is published with The
Cottrell Plan has been separated out and placed at the end of the
issue, for long-term ease-of-reference purposes.
•
If you wish
to obtain a copy and you are not a regular subscriber, please order
International Currency Review via our electronic payment system by
pressing SUBSCRIBE. This will give a full-price order sequence. Then
press CONTACT US and state that you wish to order ICR 34, #1. The
single-issue price has to be at a premium to the regular price, charged
at $200.00 per copy. Note:
Please
ensure that you send a CONTACT US email to the Publisher at the same
time as you press SUBSCRIBE, so that we KNOW to send you ONLY ICR 34,
#1 and to charge you ONLY $200.
•
The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this
combined website.
•
BOOKS:
Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The
Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph
D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story;
The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in
Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We
sell books DIRECT.
•
Please Make a Donation to help finance
Christopher Story's ongoing global financial corruption investigations,
which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the
corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to
seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been
more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of
these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will
make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst
financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The
Editor's $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been
stolen.
•
See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed
intelligence publications.
•
MICHAEL
C. COTTRELL'S PROPOSALS FOR THE REFORM OF THE U.S FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND
HIS DEBUNKING OF THE IMPRACTICABLE AND EXPENSIVE 'PAULSON' PROPOSALS,
PLUS OUR EXTENSIVE GLOSSARY, POSTED ON 22ND JULY AND REPOSTED ON 12TH
SEPTEMBER, WERE AGAIN 'SNIPPED' BY THE NSA'S MENTAL DEFECTIVES. THE
REPORT WAS REPOSTED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008. THE REPORT HAS BEEN
EXTREMELY WELL RECEIVED WORLDWIDE.
•
PRINT
EDITIONS OF THE COTTRELL PLAN: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 11,
#s 9 & 10, published in July-August, was devoted almost entirely to
The Cottrell Plan and to the extensive Glossary of financial market and
related definitions, which explains where so many people have gone
wrong. International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, also contains The
Cottrell Plan and the Glossary, placed at the end of this 400-page
issue for long-term easy reference.
•
Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be
placed via this website.
...........................................................................................................................
•
FORT
MEADE INTERFERING WITH OUR COMMUNICATIONS: Our communications with
certain parties in the United States are being crudely and illegally
sabotaged by National Security Agency idiots who imagine that it is
still possible to keep the lid on the biggest scandal in world history,
and to cover up the reality that the Bush II Administration has been
financing Al-Qaeda and other global terrorism operations. Every time
these fools try this on, they simply show their hand.
•
Midnight,
2nd-3rd December: US sources say that there has been an intensification
of illegal interference by Verizon (an intelligence entity) and other
US intelligence community organisations of interference with their
communications, as with ours, as these criminalist cadres now attempt
to prevent (a) certain drastic consequences arising from
non-performance, and (b) the distribution of the damning information in
this report about the reckless and criminal behaviour of these pigs in
Washington who are scrambling to place their filthy snouts in the
Settlements trough first.
•
The
bottom line: Our assessment that the United States is a Revolutionary
Power engaged in promoting terrorism and financing it (from a secret
operations room inside Morgan Stanley: see below) is CONFIRMED. The
torch of the World Revolution was handed by the Soviets back to the
classic revolutionary power, the United States, after 72 years
(1917-1989), 72 being the familiar Babylonian 'Rule of 72' number. The
Americans became much more dangerous than the Soviets.
But the
discovery of specific evidence that the deliberate financing of global
terrorism has all along been orchestrated from within Morgan Stanley,
and that the dirty finger marks of Bush 41, Clinton 42, Paulson,
Greenspan, Cheney and Hillary Clinton are all over the tear-sheet
evidence, which was obtained from bankers arrested in Europe during
autumn 2007, represents BY FAR THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY
which Fort Meade can now do NOTHING to cover up.
Shame
on you, stupid electronic criminalist nerds and fools, for imagining
that these crimes would remain buried from public scrutiny for ever.
Shame on you, 'mainstream' broadcast media and press people, for
succumbing to Cheney's pressure not to expose this unprecedented
criminality, which embraces CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. No wonder your
circulations and revenues are declining.
AND SHAME ON THE
BRITISH GOVERNMENT for collaborating with the TERRORIST UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT, when the CORRECT response should have been to EXPOSE THESE
TERRORISTS, rather than becoming involved in aiding and abetting these
unbelivable crimes against humanity. Collaborating with a pariah
terrorist state isn't pragmatic: it's reckless, stupid.
Last
year, we weren't allowed to report on the secret Morgan Stanley
Terrorism Financing Centre, and we were not told about it. You will see
that we were mighty close to exposing this dimension of the BIGGEST
SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY: Archive: 4th October to 11th November 2007.
•
It
is understood that we weren't informed, in part, because of fears that
exposure would have triggered, for instance, the destruction of files
and evidence: although the real reason we weren't told, we surmise, was
that IT WAS STILL THE INTENTION TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT THE UNITED
STATES HAS BEEN FINANCING AL-QAEDA. Well, now THE TRUTH IS BEING TOLD.
•
Let
the whole world know that the US criminals who pontificate the most
loudly about terrorism are those who are financing it. This was always
suspected. Now the whole world knows it.
================================================================
• NEW REPORT STARTS
HERE:
PREFACE TO THIS REPORT
In
the following report, we have concentrated on intelligence and
interpretations based on our own research and which we can vouch for,
and have largely ignored the cacophony of conflicting, angry, ‘Black’
and other propaganda that has swirled around the Internet since Barack
Obama became the President-Elect of the United States. Our reasoning
here can be summarised as follows:
•
Whatever
anyone says or believes, a decisive DISCONTINUITY has finally
materialised. A discontinuity presupposes that all previous assumptions
and relationships are either in flux, changing, or subject to change
brought about by a rearrangement of the ‘correlation of forces’.
•
In
the above context, the central fact of importance is that the United
States, and therefore the Rest of the World, have finally climbed out
of the frying pan.
•
Specifically, the United States and the Rest
of the World are therefore hovering in mid-air. It is premature to be
certain that we will all proceed to jump into the fire, because we are
as yet still suspended in mid-air between the frying pan and the fire.
•
Equipped
with this mindset, we must add that, for the purposes of this report
ONLY, we are accordingly AGNOSTIC with reference to the swirling
‘Black’ propaganda against Obama, the Clintons and everyone else on the
miserable American political scene which is (see below) manipulated by
the controlling Intelligence Power. Of course we have strong views on
all the issues that have been and continue to be raised in this
context: and in this report we specifically identify, for instance, Mrs
Clinton as a financier of terrorism. But none of these issues have ANY
relevance to the crucial issue that the whole world faces, which is:
•
The
absolute paramount necessity for the completion of the wholesale
Settlements payouts and for the implementation of the G-7-Approved
Refinancing Programme, which will refund the US and European (etc)
banks and will deliver on-the-books liquidity throughout the system
within a matter of months. The Settlements payouts will finance the
G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme.
•
Belated
resistance to the Settlements (see below) reflects rearguard operations
in the face of the reality that unavoidable repatriation threatens
those forced to repatriate, with latent criminal proceedings and
probable jail for having fraudulent assets on (or ‘under’) their books.
In
short, we are not concerned, for the purposes of THIS report, with
whether President-Elect Obama’s belief that following Abraham Lincoln’s
technique of placing his enemies at the centre of his government is
well-founded (which it may well be), with who is of course blackmailing
whom (as is known to be the case), with whether a birth certificate was
or was not registered in Timbuctoo, with the reappearance of Clinton
retreads on the stage, and with all the other murky side-issues that
have been raised by anxious observers, protagonists, ‘Black’
propagandists, controlled agents of influence, and others, since Mr
Obama was elected.
And
the reason we are not concerned HERE with such issues is that IF THE
SETTLEMENTS ARE NOT FINALISED, all these people who are shouting at
cross-purposes will eventually fall silent because the United States
and Britain (the ‘Main Enemy’) will collapse into a DEPRESSION, on the
brink of which both economies stand ‘as we speak’.
Therefore, we
do not have the luxury to waste time ventilating about these
innumerable issues, important though some of them certainly are; since
if the Settlements are not completed in short order, the economic and
financial systems will collapse under the weight of nearly $700
trillion sitting on the roof, which is on the verge of collapsing into
the basement.
In other words, it’s a matter of the proper
priorities, and avoiding being diverted by deliberately contrived
redirection and agitation and propaganda operations which are intended
to OBFUSCATE the prevailing situation in general, and the extremely
grave predicament in which ALL the financial criminals find themselves,
in particular.
And
right now, there is only one priority, if the whole world is to be
saved in time from absolute catastrophe: completing the Settlement
payouts and breaking all resistance to this process. In the United
States and Europe, ‘forces’ are moving around, even with guns, to
procure the necessary outcome (intelligence received on Monday 1st
December 2008).
This report brings what we have been able to
establish on the Settlements dimension of the world crisis, up to date.
We would, however, add that we found it somewhat distasteful that,
after eight years of rightly excoriating the Bush-Clinton Crime Dynasty
and the immense and lasting damage inflicted on the world under the
criminal Bush II-Cheney Administration, guns were immediately swivelled
round and opened fire on the President-Elect.
It
would appear that no matter who the Intelligence Power selects (as it
always does) to serve in the White House, they will always receive the
same treatment. However the source of the US malaise is that the
Intelligence Power, which appoints its agents to the top posts, is in
control, out of control and needs to be brought under control: so until
that happens, nothing fundamental is ever going to change, and the
revolutionary United States will continue sliding into the abyss.
•
WARNING:
What follows has been developed from our own, not secondary, sources.
We fully acknowledge that Obama MAY not measure up to expectations, or
worse, and that his ‘Abraham Lincoln’ rationalisation for appointing
Mrs Clinton, subject to approval by the new Senate, may turn out to be
unsound and that what is really happening is a rearranging of the
Titanic’s deck chairs on the assumption of corrupt ‘business as usual’.
•
But
the evidence assembled below suggests otherwise, if you can temporarily
suspend your perfectly reasonable disgust, which we share, at the
appointments of Queen Melusina to the State Department and Timothy
Geithner to the US Treasury.
CIA BRIEFED OBAMA IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING HIS VICTORY
Shortly
after John McCain conceded the election, which he appears to have
'thrown' inter alia by selecting the bimbo operative handled by her
husband, Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska, Mr Barack Obama was informed
that he would be briefed at the earliest possible moment by the
intelligence community. This is extremely unusual, if not
unprecedented.
•
Mr Obama has been receiving daily CIA briefings ever since.
It
is understood that the first briefing took place the day after the
election. Since then-Senator Obama had been a junior Senator, he had
not been informed about the financial corruption with which a number of
his fellow Senators were involved up to their necks. He had been in the
Senate for four years, but for almost two of these years he had often
been absent on the campaign trail.
.............................................................................................
ILLEGAL INTERFERENCE BY U.S. AIR FORCE PERSONNEL
Ahead
of the election, Barack Obama had been approached by US Air Force
personnel, and asked to step down. It is believed that an attempt to
bribe him to do so was also made. The US Air Force is heavily
indoctrinated, while supporters of the Constitution holding high-level
Air Force posts were removed earlier in 2008, leaving key people in
charge who are corrupt and involved in the financial fraud and thefts.
Interference by armed forces personnel in the civilian political
process (albeit that it is manipulated and controlled by the
Intelligence Power: see below) is strictly prohibited by the Universal
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and of course as a constitutional
expert, Barack Obama immediately told the Air Force representatives to
‘get lost’. He will presumably also have made a note of their
identities so that their illegal behaviour catches up with them later.
Following
our report on 31st October that the corrupted former British Prime
Minister Tony Blair had ‘rolled over’ on all the familiar highest-level
criminalists and their institutional and state co-conspirators, from
Bush 41 and 43, the Clintons and the Pope, to Chancellor Merkel,
Deutsche Bank and elements of the Hungarian Government (always secretly
aligned with the STASI/DVD), it had become imperative to divulge to the
new President-elect what had been going on behind the scenes in the
darkness.
We understand that Blair’s testimony has now thrown
so many grenades into the blazing furnace that explosions are going off
in all directions, causing the previously asbestos-clad rats to rush
around all over the place inside the furnace trying to escape the heat
and flames before they are all engulfed by them. This is a late factor
that has briefly 'delayed' resolution of the Settlements. It has had
this effect because the Blair capitulation has CHANGED EVERYTHING for
the criminalists, in that their bluff has been called and THESE RATS
cannot now escape.
•
SERVES THEM RIGHT FOR AGAIN ABUSING THE GENEROSITY OF THEIR 'CLOSEST
ALLY'.
Especially
given Blair’s revelations of the relevant sensitive issues, in which he
shopped all the main financial criminals and his fellow highest-level
co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these immense crimes,
the US intelligence authorities had been left with no choice in the
matter, since they had not been in the driving seat for many months
(see below) and risked very severe consequences should they themselves
withhold crucial information about the corruption, from the
President-elect. The ‘sensible’ decision was therefore taken to brief
Barack Obama at the earliest opportunity. We are advised that he
received what he was told with shock and contempt.
...........................................................................................................
OBAMA ALSO SHOCKED TO FIND THAT BIDEN KNEW ALL ABOUT IT
Of
particular concern, we understand, to President-Elect Obama was his
realisation that his Vice-Presidential colleague, Mr Biden, knew all
about the financial corruption (let us leave the matter there) and so,
by definition, may have committed an offence under the Misprision of
Felony Statute (1), at the very least, and will, on further
investigation, have been a co-conspirator to some degree or another.
This realisation explains why Biden was subsequently described as being
‘unhappy’ with the situation in which he now found himself. Could it be
that Biden, to put the worst possible construction on the matter, may
have expected his future boss to succumb to the bribery pressure that
the corrupt incumbent in the White House would be likely to impose upon
him?
The
Editor’s original notes on information received at 8.20pm UK time on
6th November include a reference to indications that Senator Obama was
first informed to a limited extent that a gigantic scandal with
explosive implications was out of control back in May 2008, but that he
was not given pertinent details at the time. Our notes state that Mr
Obama ‘only started to find out after he was elected and received
private security briefings by CIA agents. He’s starting to find out how
many figures were involved, and he’s saying [expletive deleted]. His
meetings started yesterday and continued all day today. He’s furious
and also very angry at Biden. It has never been known for a
President-Elect to receive CIA briefings immediately his election has
been confirmed'. Our sources elaborated that ‘Obama’s meeting with his
financial team. He learned this stuff and was horrified'.
Briefing
Obama on this occasion must in any case have been a distrinctly painful
experience for the compromised General Hayden, Director of Central
Intelligence, and also for John Negroponte, the former Director of
National Intelligence (see below), if he too had to attend the
briefing, since the CIA and its numerous appendages and so-called
subsidiary agencies are notoriously disruptive revolutionary criminal
enterprises that have themselves been fully engaged in spearheading the
fraudulent finance dimension of the World Revolution.
VOLCKER, A TRUSTEE, HAS SOUND REASONS FOR HIS ADVICE
In
this connection, the key member of Obama’s financial advisory team, and
a powerful adviser during the later stages of Mr Obama’s campaign, is
Paul Volcker, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and a
man who, whatever critics may say, is held in the highest esteem
internationally. As a ‘righteous Jew’, this expert is believed to abhor
all the financial corruption, although he IS a Trustee for ‘the
Settlements'.
•
Over 1,000 Trustees were originally appointed, all of them connected in
some way to Bush Sr.
This
does not necessarily mean that all Trustees are or will have been
compromised (although Bush Sr. always seeks to double-cross, intimidate
and/or compromise those with whom he has dealings). In the present
context, what it means is that Volcker himself, as a Trustee, needed to
be paid, so that he, too, could fulfil his obligations as a Trustee
towards other parties. That has been a very significant fact in the
overall quadrilateral equation.
•
On 27th November, Reuters reported that Mr Obama had picked Volcker to
head a special office to advise on economic and financial recovery.
...........................................................................................
SATELLITE-LINKED TRADING AND ECONOMIC TERRORISM
One
dimension of this pointless activity has typically included the
distribution inside the United States of special satellite-linked ‘grey
screen’ trading equipment enabling selected operatives to conduct
secret off-balance sheet and therefore illegal 'terrorist' trading from
their own homes, often ostensibly unknown even to their own family
members. This activity has been very severely curtailed or stopped
altogether, as all transactions and funds associated with this trading
is tracked 24/7. Many operatives engaged in these illegal trades have
had to close down their operations, have gone to ground, or have been
arrested.
When tackled about these activities in the past,
members of such US operatives’ families, who ‘sort of’ knew what was
going on, have typically tended to fall back on the words ‘national
security’ when asked direct questions about what such unusual satellite
trading equipment was being used for – this phrase being favoured as
cover for the reality that the trading equipment had been given to the
operatives by the CIA et al. to enable them to conduct illegal,
off-balance sheet, untaxed, secret fraudulent finance counterparty
trading operations undetected, as such transactions are or were of
course all unaudited and subject to no checks and balances at all.
•
By
their involvement in such hidden fraudulent financial trading activity,
the secret Agency-linked traders, located all over the United States,
were engaged in economic terrorism and are accordingly vulnerable, as
the purge widens, to being arrested and indicted for such crimes.
Of
course even family members who knew what their spouses were up to may
genuinely have assumed that their secret trading activities were
covered by the National Security Act of 1947 et seq.; but since most of
these people knew perfectly well what was going on, their toleration of
such corrosive activities, amounting to economic terrorism, which have
created such growing havoc by accelerating the rate of expansion of the
overhang of unrealisable outstanding fiat obligations, represents a
prima facie breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute.
DOUBLE-MINDED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE SERVES DVD’S AGENDA
The
CIA’s fraudulent finance operations have been systematically destroying
the global financial economy in accordance with the bribery-oriented
blueprint developed by George Bush Sr. and the corrupt Dr Alan
Greenspan for Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, the heirs of
the Nazi Abwehr originally directed from Oklahoma City by the late
Admiral Canaris, who operated under the assumed name of Samuel Randall
Pittman until he fell ill in 1974, when his place was occupied on a
temporary basis by the triple or quadruple agent Dr Henry Kissinger,
who has never managed to discard his hideously guttural German accent,
which no American ever seems to have questioned!
Kissinger
persuaded President Gerald Ford (a.k.a. the pornographer Leslie Lynch
King Jr.) to fire William Colby (later ‘suicided’ during a ‘canoe trip’
on the Potomac) and to replace him as DCI with George Henry Walker Bush
Sr. (Scherff), a long-time Abwehr/DVD asset and CIA agent implicated in
the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in a manoeuvre whereby
the DVD came to control the Central Intelligence Agency totally (rather
than partially through the notorious earlier postwar penetrations). In
April 2008, a ‘connected’ US visitor who appeared at our London office
without an appointment on Good Friday, volunteered that our DVD
analysis ‘is 100% correct’.
LONG-RANGE PAN-GERMAN REVANCHIST STRATEGIC DECEPTION
The
pan-German ‘Black’ DVD Nazi strategic deception Continuum is motivated
by a hatred of the ‘Anglo-Saxons’ for having supposedly ‘won’ two World
Wars as a consequence of which Germany was virtually destroyed. In
1941-42, the Nazis set up a German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid, which
became a haven for Gestapo officers, who occupied all the main hotels
there for many years. In the early 1950s, the Allies intercepted a
document that they labelled the ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ which spelled
out pan-German long-range plans to reverse the outcomes of the two
World Wars.
This document elaborated on Nazi policy papers
captured by the Allies at the end of the Second Illuminati War, one of
which boasted that ‘we shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins
of the United States’, as explained in great detail in the Editor’s
book ‘The New Underworld Order’.
The ‘Madrid Circular Letter' claimed that ‘für uns
ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (for us, the war never ended). But the
West in general , and the United States in particular, complacently
assumed that, having personalised the enemy in the format of the
hate-figure of Hitler, that operative’s demise represented the end of
the Nazi menace. This view was catastrophically mistaken.
For,
as described in the Editor’s book and widely elaborated elsewhere, the
Nazi repression and intelligence chief in the Soviet Union, General
Reinhard Gehlen, not only managed to persuade a willing US political
and intelligence class that Mr Stalin was preparing to invade Western
Europe (whereas in reality Josef Djiugashivili-Kochba had only one and
a half mechanised divisions, the rest being either decimated or still
horse-drawn, while his repression cadres were bogged down with imposing
their control over the newly-annexed satellites), but also over time
procured the mass penetration of the US intelligence community and
other US structures with ‘former’ Nazi operatives and scientists,
finally backing the reconstituted European elements of his former
networks into the Germany-based US intelligence structures themselves
(CIA-1, Frankfurt).
.................................................................................................
WORLD NOW ENGULFED IN A CHAOTIC INTELLIGENCE WAR
All
intelligence organisations today are at war within themselves, as all
have been penetrated by foreign powers and domestic enemies, as a
consequence of which no intelligence operative can ever trust any of
his or her colleagues and must live with the knowledge that he or she
is liable to be deceived, double-crossed or entrapped without warning
at any stage of a given operation.
The upshot is that the whole
world is now engulfed in a ruthless, no-holds-barred, long-running and
now red-hot intelligence war over money, which is actually destroying
all money and asset values on a scale with no historical precedent. We
did predict this outcome in our reports dated 2nd September 2006, and
in reports posted, for instance, on 18th and 27th July 2007 [see
Archive].
As
indicated earlier, the intelligence war over money had been raging
largely below the radar, with periodic eruptions, certainly since the
Second World War. But given the terrible intransigence of the organised
intelligence community-linked criminals who hijacked the White House
and the US Treasury under the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, we need
hardly be surprised that many unruly elements of the darkness are
taking matters into their own hands, seeking to ignite flashpoints in
the cynical expectation of being able to foment wars and rumours of
wars which can subsequently be exploited to cover up their financial
thefts and fraudulent operations. For instance, the Bombay atrocities
could well have been associated with the Bush-linked ‘Black’ forces'
fury that the Indian authorities may have ‘ceased to cooperate’ over
$2.0 trillion that was illegally transferred, you will recall, to UBS
New Delhi, in the course of 2007, when the criminal financial
operations were at their peak, before our exposures had started to
bring the perpetrators to book.
Amazingly,
however, these penetrated and internally warring intelligence
communities ‘rely upon’ the ‘Rule of Law’ as a back-stop, even though
some of them (headed by the CIA) treat the ‘Rule of Law’ with absolute
contempt and consider that they have an open-ended license to break the
law, the only rule being ‘you are on you’re own if you get caught’.
CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE INCOMPATIBLE WITH GOOD GOVERNANCE
Self-evidently,
the existence of criminal enterprise intelligence communities as evil
as the CIA and its ‘subsidiaries’ is quite incompatible with good
governance and indeed with national and external stability and
wellbeing. Moreover, as we have explained both electronically and in
several of our publications, the aggressive Intelligence Power acquires
hegemony over the other two sides of the power triangle, the Military
Power and ‘The Party’ which, in the geomasonic control model, is split
between two main factions (Thesis, Republicans and the Conservative
Party; Antithesis, the US Democrats or the Labour Party). The
Intelligence Power typically develops its odious status as the immense,
arrogant ‘State within the State’ by exploiting its power of
penetration and its ‘licence to deceive’, so that it places its own
operatives inside the Military Power and The Party. In both Britain and
the United States, the Intelligence Power selects and prepares
candidates for the highest offices from among the ranks of its
operatives or assets – giving rise to our aphorisms:
•
‘The Intelligence Power is in control, out of control
and needs to be brought under control’; and:
•
‘It is neither here nor there which faction of The Party wins
elections,
because the Intelligence Power always wins’.
In
the parallel and almost identical (covert) Soviet model, exactly the
same phenomenon applies. This central reality (which few Americans yet
seem to grasp) does not detract from the fact that the two wings of The
Party are or can be at almost perpetual loggerheads with each other,
and bitter enemies at all times. After all, enmity, hatred, conflict,
antagonism, lying, deceit, reprobate abuse, paedophilia,
double-crossing, bearing false witness and all the other familiar
‘Black’ behaviour that is characteristic of the darkness are
presupposed, given that Evil Spirit is in charge here.
Perpetual
conflict and tension (which the controlled operatives Trotsky and Mao
Tse-Tung took to the extreme of advocating and promoting 'Permanent
Revolution') are the necessary prerequisites for 'fruitful'
manipulation of the dialectical process (Thesis, Antithesis,
Synthesis), with successive dialectical cycles occurring until (in
theory) such time as the pre-intended 'Synthesis' is achieved.
But
of course, as all this is the work of the Devil, that never actually
happens: hence the use of the word 'Revolution', meaning going round
and round in circles.
The word 'reactionary' was developed as
a label to be used against all who oppose going round and round in
circles, with the completely illogical connotation that those who
prefer standing still and not getting dizzy by going round in circles,
are boring stick-in-the muds who can be dismissed as beyond their
sell-by-date. The use of twisted semantics is an important
revolutionary tool.
..........................................................................................................
TABLES DECISIVELY TURNED AGAINST PARTS OF THE OCTOPUS
Anyway, we diverge (on purpose), don’t we?
Actually,
a modicum of scene-setting has been considered necessary, in particular
so as to address two rearguard agitprop campaigns that erupted the
moment John McCain conceded the election, leaving Barack Obama as the
President-elect. McCain is reported to have decided to ‘throw’ the
election in part because, finally, he had become sick of the endless
corruption, and preferred the prospect of retiring to a status of
'elder statesman', not least so that the far-reaching purge that we
identified and predicted in our report dated 6th November 2007, would
not be liable to be focused in his direction. In that report, we
published paragraphs headed as follows:
•
'Why the overdue purge, once started, will now continue';
•
'The bad apples will continue to be purged'; and:
•
'The American people will suffer because they cannot get on top of
the most dangerous pack of deceiving and thieving wolves in the world'.
DEFEATED 'GERMAN FACTION' FURIOUS THAT IT HAS BEEN COMPREHENSIVELY
THRASHED
The
good news, as will be explained below, is that, at long last, the
tables are now being decisively turned against these ruthless criminal
operatives – a fact which has so far escaped the attention of most
Americans, and has certainly not been well understood by many
correspondents in the United States impatient for progress but lacking
adequate information, who appear to imagine that these evils can
somehow be remedied overnight, let alone by various frantic authors of
certain hysterical electronic postings which have their known origins
in last-ditch US counterintgelligence agitprop operations separately
designed to destabilise the President-elect, and the British.
Both these sewage outflows of disinformation have been driven by the
following realities:
•
THE
UNITED STATES IS NOW RANK BUST. It is IN HOCK to the European powers.
This is NOT a result of deliberate entrapment by these European powers:
it is a consequence of the unfortunate failure of the American people
to clean up their country's mess, which is to say, their failure to
find a mechanism for ridding the political structures of the corrupt
organised criminals who hijacked the US political process many years
ago for illegal and corrupt self-enrichment purposes.
•
No-one in
Europe blames the American people for this failure: it is hardly THEIR
fault that such a ruthless gang of criminals and thieves took over
their Government and turned it into a murderous money-making machine
for their own purposes, to the detriment of the American people and of
the whole world, leaving the United States with a degraded reputation
as a pariah state.
•
After all, the United
States 'replaced' Britain as the leading power in the world, and
expects the Rest of the World to hold its currency, as prescribed under
the Bretton Woods system, which ALSO laid down that the second,
offsetting, world currency shall remain the pound sterling (which is
why, contrary to what the President of the European Commission is now
claiming, Britain is NOT about to dump the pound and substitute the
European Collective Currency, which is backed by nothing, has no
Treasury and lacks any Government in the true sense).
•
Contrary
to the bitter propaganda motivated precisely by the fact that the
DVD-linked criminals holding the highest offices have now been
COMPREHENSIVELY DEFEATED, a nasty rearguard 'Blacking' operation (which
no-one other than the less well-informed (through no fault of their
own) takes seriously) has suggested that the Brits have got the 'upper
hand': whereas what has really happened is that the thefts of The
Queen's gold and attempted thefts of Her Majesty's loan funds, and
other financial crimes against the Sovereign arising from the
surreptitious instalment by Bush-Blair of fraudulent finance operations
involving Deutsche Bank and the Vatican Bank run through Coutts Bank as
clearing house, have been 'put in order'.
At
the same time, since the financial crimes were committed abroad,
especially in Britain, British law enforcement, intelligence and
justice hAVE been deployed to procure the intended outcome against the
intransigent wishes of the scorched and defeated criminalists and their
some of their intelligence and banking associates, and latterly now of
Gordon Brown [see below].
•
The pan-German Fifth Column headed by
the DVD’s Bush Sr. (Scherff) have now been thrashed so badly, and
repeatedly thrashed so badly, that they are bleeding and screaming and
bellyaching as they wallow in the mess resulting from their newly
exposed criminality, alike a spoilt child who has been disciplined and
refuses to submit to any discipline whatsoever.
•
There
is nothing (apart from organising retaliatory flashpoint atrocities
such as shipping trigger-happy mind-controlled False Flag terrorist
cadres by boat into Bombay and ordering them through compartmentalised
cutouts to indulge in a sadistic bloodbath of Jews and other
foreigners) that they can now do about this massive defeat that they
are experiencing.
DIVERSIONARY PURPOSE OF PANICKY ANTI-BRITISH AGITPROP
The
purpose of the crude attacks on the British that we have been seeing of
late is therefore to reverse the truth – which is that the criminal
financial operations, equating to financing terrorism, were and have
continued to be recklessly perpetrated by these arrogant US criminal
operatives against The Queen (see below) and Britain generally, as well
as against certain other key European countries. Those controlled
diversion and redirection outlets that have been pointing the finger at
the British have been ordered or encouraged to do so by their handlers,
as part of a crude, belated and futile rearguard response to the stark
and decisive defeat these criminals have suffered and are facing, to
try to obfuscate what has been going on, and to salvage the wounded
pride of those agents of influence who have been unwilling to
comprehend that the criminality originated at home but had to be
exported to Europe and beyond because the relevant financial fraud
operations were and remain illegal under, inter alia, the US securities
laws.
See
also, appended at the foot of this report, the list of US Statutes that
the American perpetrators flouted, and for which many of their number,
including representatives of the criminal enterprises, will certainly
be called to account as a consequence of crucial US judicial processes
which remain empanelled and are intensively engaged in comprehensive
reviews of the epidemic of Bush-linked fraudulent finance highlighted
by these exposures. These processes will impinge upon the Senate
confirmation hearings, which will need to consider the criminal
activities of certain nominees.
Recall
that nine aircraft were commandeered, as reported in our posting dated
6th November 2007, to transport thousands of arrested US bankers to
European centres, especially Britain, where they were taken into
custody under the European anti-terrorism legislation. As we reported
recently, the bankers and others, including some of their lawyers, were
duly jailed for periods of 25 years, with the aggregate number of such
prisoners languishing in British and European jails now believed to
exceed 10,000. Further information about what they were up to, is
contained in the present report.
BUSH TRIED TO BRIBE OBAMA WHEN HE VISITED THE WHITE HOUSE
When
considering what follows, it will be as well to remind ourselves that
what is presented for public consumption may of course diverge 100%
from the reality. Hence widely distributed press photographs of
President-elect Obama and his wife flanked by a mean-looking President
George W. Bush who has made a complete mess of his Presidency, and his
wife Laura with her stiff false smile, at the White House on Monday
10th November, were intended to imply that the outgoing team had been
engaged in a polite encounter, smoothing the way for the
President-Elect to assume power – and displaying before the whole world
that the United States transfers power without acrimony.
Nothing
could have been further from the truth about what happened on Monday
10th November, when Mr and Mrs Obama appeared at the White House on
schedule. For according to our special sources, what then happened was
that Mr Obama was immediately subjected to the Bush bribery routine.
Specifically, heavy pressure was exerted on him to meet the wishes of
the Bush-Cheney criminalist gangsters in exchange for a huge payout,
the proportions of which have not yet been specified (whereas it is
known that a huge volume of gold was paid to a previous contender for
high office on an earlier occasion).
Reflecting
his innate strength of character, his standards of belief and conduct
and his extensive knowledge as a former professor of constitutional law
in Chicago, Barack Obama reacted with an outright rejection, along the
lines inter alia of ‘you must be joking’ – whereupon there really
wasn’t much more to be said. The Bush Crime Family had finally ‘blown
it’.
These criminal operatives behaved as they have behaved
all along – assuming that the Cheney-favoured post-war
neo-Nazi-originated power-building technique of bribery, with its
corollary of blackmail and control, would ‘work’, as had been the case
in innumerable instances before. They took the desperate risk that
their offer might be turned down, without stopping to think what the
consequences of such an 'inconceivable' rejection would be likely to
be.
BUSH WARNED: ‘DO NOT TOUCH OBAMA, OR ELSE…’
In
order to register the momentous consequences of this encounter on 10th
November 2008, a concomitant development must be reported here.
Following Obama’s election victory, George Bush Sr. and associates,
including his cokehead son, were informed by powerful but unspecified
parties that if they proceeded with their project to have
President-Elect Barack Obama 'removed' – an intention that had been
discovered to be a reality, as opposed to wishful thinking – all those
concerned would immediately be liquidated without further ado.
•
Now it will
be recalled that we have previously reported that Bush Sr., the
Personification of Evil, has previously been warned that he would be
shot dead on sight – a warning he has ignored.
•
In 2004, when
confronted by representatives of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about his
open-ended criminal operations at home and abroad, the charming Mr
George Bush Sr. is reported to have shouted: ‘Go take a flying
[expletive deleted] at the moon’. [Verbatim].
But this time, the
force of the warning appears to have penetrated one ear of the relevant
skulls without immediately shooting out of the other one – as usually
happens, given that there is not a lot in between. It was borne in upon
these crooks that the Intelligence Power had long since made up its
mind WHO was to be President of the United States, and that the US
Intelligence Power was supported by the Military Power as well – not
least, at this late stage, because the Military Power knows what the
consequences in terms of domestic revolutionary social unrest would be
liable to be, should anything happen to the new President-Elect.
BLAIR SUBJECTED TO INTENSE INTERROGATION IN THE UNITED STATES
In
other words, the temperature immediately following the election could
be described as close to boiling point, especially as the former
British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, had crossed the Atlantic for a
second time, to appear in Washington DC for further questioning.
•
This
followed his capitulation two weeks or so earlier when, faced with a
summons to appear, as ordered by Speaker Michael Martin, before a House
of Commons Committee ostensibly called upon to investigate the
11-year-old matter of Blair’s exemption of the Formula One motor racing
sector from a ban on tobacco advertising shortly after Blair had seen
its controller, the dubious Monaco-based Bernie Ecclestone in 1997,
Blair had decided to ‘roll over’ on all the primary participants in
this fraudulent finance epidemic, as we reported here on 31st October
2008.
As
explained in that report, UK Parliamentary committees will only address
issues that are before the relevant House and concern its specific
business; so the intention had been to entrap Blair with evidence based
inter alia (but not exclusively) upon evidence that surfaced following
the raids on the ‘safety lock boxes’ by 300 armed Metropolitan Police
masterminded by Assistant Deputy Metropolitan Police Commissioner John
Yates on 2nd June 2008 – an absolutely crucial, decisive development in
the process of unravelling the criminal operations of the Octopus.
BLAIR AND BUSH SET LONDON UP AS FRAUDULENT FINANCE PLATFORM
On
Sunday 2nd November, Blair had been obliged to rush to the United
States for the first time since he had ‘rolled over’, inter alia to
sign certain key release documents in the presence, it is believed, of
two Supreme Court Black Robes. With such information surfacing, it now
began to emerge that Blair had been much more deeply involved (see
below) with the fraudulent finance operations than may have previously
been understood. For on 3rd November, we were able to establish from
two reliable sources that:
•
Following
9/11 (when a large portfolio of contracts had perished given that the
offices and 652 personnel of Cantor Fitzgerald, the British-based money
brokerage firm, had been destroyed when the Twin Towers were blown up),
and certainly by May 2003 when the Editor of this service started to
become aware of this, former President Bush 41 and Prime Minister Blair
had been instrumental in procuring the exploitation of London as the
main ‘platform’ for a new wave of fraudulent finance operations inter
alia using stolen assets as base. The Bank of England provided secret
offshore account facilities for this purpose as well, and has been
directly involved in these activities: hence (a) the arrest of the
former Governor, Eddie (Lord) George, in July 2007, and (b) the tension
that is evident on the face of the current Governor of the Bank of
England, Mervyn King.
•
Specifically,
Coutts Bank, ‘The Queen’s bank’, was selected to serve as clearing
house (money laundry) to move secret fiat funds through to Deutsche
Bank, the DVD’s ‘house bank’, and on to the Vatican Bank, by now
directed by the former President of the Bundesbank, Herr Dr Hans
Tietmeyer, under the control of the German Pope Ratzinger. At Coutts,
there is or was a lock box containing substantial usurped collateral
assets which may have underpinned at least part of this operation.
•
Nefarious
intentions here included a blatant attempt to compromise Her Majesty
the Queen by exploiting the services of this institution, Coutts Bank,
known to have connections with Royalty.
•
More
generally, cover for this illicit financial activity was to be
provided, crudely put, by The Queen, unknown to her, and the Pope
simultaneously.
•
Incredibly, the conduit ‘enabling’ aspects of
this criminalist assault to be perpetrated is reported to us to have
been a certain Bernie Ecclestone, whose Formula One (cover?) operations
are based in Monaco which is the CIA’s main European money-laundering
centre.
Formula One.
which may be a massively ‘lucrative’ money laundry (serving the
necessary 'project' purpose applicable to all such finance), is known
to have very extensive German dimensions and is ultimately controlled
by Max Mosely, son of Sir Oswald Mosley, head of the British Fascist
Party and a Mussolini symathiser, and the supremely snobby socialite
Diana Mitford, who had been a personal friend of Adolf
Hitler-Schickelgrüber and a Nazi sympathiser (both of whom were
interned by the British Government at the outbreak of the Second
Illuminati War).
Hence
the significance of Speaker Michael Martin’s order for Blair to appear
before a House of Commons investigating committee over the 1997
'Ecclestone affair'.
•
There is also an extraordinary separate
‘Ecclestone’ dimension which would appear to have represented an early
attempt by UK authorities to bear false witness against the Editor of
this service in order to discourage him from pursuing these enquiries
(an operation which of course had the opposite effect). This dimension
is elaborated on pages F-03 et seq. of the new issue of International
Currency Review [Volume 34, Number 1], published at the end of November
2008, excerpts from which are posted below in the Appendix.
On 21st November it was extensively publicised that
the diminutive (5ft 4ins) Ecclestone is to be divorced by his extremely
tall Croatian wife (and DVD handler?) Slavica, who could be in line for
a record-breaking divorce settlement, as many of his assets are
reported to be lodged in her name. The timing of this development is
‘curious’, to say the last.
POWERS OF ATTORNEY TO INVESTIGATE COUTTS LOCK BOX
In
March 2005, the Editor of this service was granted a strictly limited
(at his request) Power of Attorney empowering him to investigate and
report on the existence of certain assets held at Coutts Bank. The
Editor attended the offices of Attorney Steven Goodwin in Richmond, VA,
from where a conference call to Coutts Bank was arranged at which Mr
Goodwin was to inform the bank that he would be attending at Coutts
with the Editor in this connection.
The phone call was
initially directed to a Mrs Burgess, a contact previously established
by the Editor; but when put through, it was diverted to a Mr Robertson,
a Scot presumably installed by Royal Bank of Scotland, of which Coutts,
via Natwest Bank, was by now a subsidiary (such hasty banking mergers
facilitate the hiding of irregular transactions).
•
This
Mr Robertson did his best to affect total ignorance of the assets in
question. At the end of the said conference call, the Editor surprised
Mr Robertson by interjecting to say that as Editor of International
Currency Review, he was conducting an extensive investigation into
missing and hijacked finances worldwide, which was one reason why he
would be attending at Coutts Bank accompanied by Mr Goodwin, as had
been tentatively arranged for early April 2005.
On 3rd April
[see Figure 23, International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3
& 4, page F-124, facsimile], Mr Goodwin wrote to Robertson at
Coutts Bank's central London address, 440 Strand, London WC2R 0QS,
demanding information about certain corporate accounts and noting (by
way of illustration) as follows:
‘Enclosed
herewith please find a specific Power of Attorney granting me access to
this [specified] information. I would specifically refer you to an
account in the name of Pacific Victory S.A., having an account number
of Z 63 66 76. It is my understanding that on or about April 26 1999, a
significant transfer was made into this account at your bank from
Standard Chartered Bank, and [that] this transaction was handled by
bank officer J. D. Fleming, and/or John S. de C. Firth, Vice-President’.
‘Please contact me immediately regarding these accounts. I look forward
to your prompt response’.
CONFERENCE CALL IGNITED RED LIGHTS EVERYWHERE
In
the light of the fact that Coutts Bank had been selected, we now know,
as the clearing house for the illicit transactions referenced above,
you can imagine that the reaction of US and international eavesdroppers
to that conference call will have been, shall we say, one of
considerable alarm – especially, one would imagine, at Fort Meade, GCHQ
Cheltenham, and at the DVD's listening post near Munich. How was it
possible that a mere investigative journalist was so rapidly onto the
tail of this newly relaunched fraudulent finance undercover
money-laundering operation sponsored by George Bush Sr. and the British
Prime Minister, Tony Blair?
At
that stage of the investigations, the Editor had been advised that the
intention was to repatriate all the funds deposited outside the United
States and illegally deployed (both by the institutions and by corrupt
US operatives) as collateral following the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet
Union, with the collaboration of the bribed Gorbachëv and of the
key
GRU operative Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
But not long after
this telephone conference call, a clandestine ‘switch’ took place, and
the Editor was in due course informed that $4.5 trillion, by way of a
settlement, had been sent over from the People’s Bank of China in May
2006 (after the no-longer-dead Howie Kwong Kok’s signature for the
release had been obtained). These funds were supposed to have been made
available to finance what is now called the G-7-Approved Refunding
Programme, with effect from June 2006: instead of which, the US
Treasury Secretary-designate, Henry M. Paulson, secretly signed a
certain contract alienating the funds on 20th or 21st June 2006.
•
Since
this was of course all done behind closed doors, the Editor was not
informed and we embarked, as requested, upon what became our globally
disseminated ‘Wantagate’ quest for fulfilment of the delivery, which
never materialised.
•
It now appears that we were encouraged to do precisely this (which was
why the Editor was ‘left alone’) as COVER for the switch and diversion
of the funds that had already taken place.
...........................................................................................................
GROSS ERROR OF JUDGEMENT BY U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
If
so, that was a catastrophic mistake on the part of the US intelligence
community’s cack-handed strategists. OK, we were deceived at the time,
and for a long time. But the deception led directly to the global
crisis that is now unfolding, because in pursuing the whereabouts and
handling of the $4.5 trillion, we unexpectedly exposed successive
layers of US official and banking sector duplicity and corruption,
which led in December 2006 to Paulson’s arrest in Germany, and
thereafter to the successive peeling away of the onion of gross deceit
and fraudulent finance which precipitated what became known as the
‘sub-prime crisis’ – a ‘slide’ imposed by US counterintelligence on the
situation, designed to prevent the ‘mainstream’ media from
investigating further.
As
this catastrophe expanded, we specifically warned that the outcome
would be a ‘train wreck’: see, for instance, our reports dated 18th
July 2007 (‘Touch and Go’); 27th July 2008 (‘Global Train Wreck’); 10th
August 2007 (‘And so it came to pass: (Subtitled) Finally, years of
financial fraud start unravelling’); 30th August 2007 (‘The ‘sub-prime’
link: How Wantagate unravelled the ‘sub-prime’ scams’) [see Archive],
not to mention innumerable other posted warnings along the same lines,
starting with our earliest prediction of what would happen in the
financial and the ‘real’ worlds if Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary,
continued with his corrupt practices (2nd September 2006).
In
other words, the highest-level perpetrators of these fraudulent
financial manoeuvres, headed by the Bush and Clinton Crime Families,
Paulson, Cheney, Greenspan and the rest, PERSISTED with their illegal,
unconstitutional behaviour as economic terrorists, in the face of both
our warnings of what their behaviour would lead to, and the rapidly
accumulating confirmations that these warnings were soundly based. Even
when that was OBVIOUS to all who were not sitting on their brains, they
CONTINUED WITH THEIR MANIPULATIONS AND DECEPTION MANOEUVRES.
It
is thought that during this period, because the ‘mainstream’,
controlled and directed by Cheney, remained fast asleep, the US
criminalists assumed complacently that the warnings posted on this
website could be safely ignored. But what was also ignored was that the
Editor of this service is the longest-serving editor of economic and
financial publications in the world.
•
We were writing and
analysing this stuff when Bush Jr. was evading the draft, and Paulson
was still metaphorically speaking in short pants.
BLAIR INFLUENCED BY THE GERMAN MOLE ROY JENKINS
A
relevant word here about Tony Blair’s political pedigree. Blair, an
intelligence officer, was a protégé of Roy Jenkins, one
of the Oxford
undergraduates who, with Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon (the joint
signatories of the illegal British Treaty of Accession to the European
Economic Community in 1972) had been recruited decades earlier by
pan-German interests, as exposed in the first report to have been
posted on this website (dated 12th October 2005).
Heath, in
fact, was the longest-serving mole ever to have been exposed (which
occurred, by the way, in 2003). Hence Blair’s geopolitical orientation
was influenced by Heath’s fellow traitor Roy Jenkins. Blair was
responsible for appointing John Scarlett as head of MI6; and as also
reported here, John Scarlett serves the interests of the pan-German
agenda (i.e., the Abwehr/DVD), which initiated and controls the
European Union Collective, an anti-nation state entrapment instrument,
the purpose of which is to defang, collectivise, ‘enronise’ and also
entrap its constituent Member States, in accordance with the blueprint
specified in the Nazis’ 1941 compendium ‘Europäische
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (‘European Economic Community), published by
Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Pashke in Berlin in
1943, copies of which may be inspected in the Staatsbibliothek, Berlin,
and in the British Library (on request).
•
As
previously reiterated here, the chapter headings of this Nazi tome are
almost identical to the chapter headings of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty,
which represented the culmination of this Nazi blueprint for achieving
political control and regional hegemony.
MISGUIDED BRITISH IDOLATRY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
The
British Establishment’s blind idolatry of our membership of the
disastrous and institutionally corrupt European Union Collective is of
course a scandal of immense proportions, not least in the prevailing
economic and financial context, when the Government’s financial
problems could be addressed, as proposed in the preceding report, by
diverting all UK payments destined for the European Commission into a
suspense account, pending the rectification of the Commission’s
fraudulent financing and accounting practices.
Since
the Commission’s accounts have been adjudged to be irregular for the
past 14 years by the European Court of Auditors, it is beyond
scandalous that the British Government still continues to squander more
than £50 billion of taxpayers’ funds per year to finance this
corrupt
and reprobate geopolitical, globalist sink-hole.
•
The only
reason this idolatry remains intact is that operatives at the highest
levels of the British political system, such as Blair and now Brown
(see below), are/were compromised.
EMPANELLED INVESTIGATIONS LOOKING INTO WIDE SPECTRUM OF THIS CORRUPTION
Concerning
the United States, there is a dimension of the ever-broadening
unravelling process that we are prevented by US practice and legal
constraints from reviewing.
We refer again to certain
empanelled, ongoing judicial processes that have been engaged in
comprehensive investigations into multiple US dimensions of the
fraudulent finance operations, including the criminal alienation of the
original $4.5 trillion, as discussed below, and for instance the
Halliburton operations installed inside the Central Intelligence Agency
and in the Pentagon which have been systematically defrauding the two
structures and the US taxpayer (see report of 26th May 2008: Archive),
profiting from the Iraqi and Afghan wars and deaths on a prodigious
scale.
•
Given these ongoing processes, it seems to us, and
others, to be most unlikely that the high-profile perpetrators will
escape the devastating consequences of their serial financial crimes.
•
The machinery of the Rule of Law grinds slowly, but excessively finely.
This all TAKES TIME.
PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS ARE NO USE: CRIMES WERE COMMITTED ABROAD
There
has been talk, inevitably, of Presidential pardons, which was what
President Bush Jr. was clearly signalling when, immediately ahead of
Thanksgiving, he was reported to have conducted a ceremony in the Rose
Garden at which he pardoned two turkeys.
•
In practice,
Presidential pardons will provide perpetrators of these crimes with no
protection at all, since the grotesque serial financial crimes in
question, including the stealing of The Queen’s gold, from which the
Clintons profited (see below), were perpetrated against foreign powers
and sovereigns, starting with Her Majesty The Queen.
One can
well imagine, therefore, that, as Secretary of State, Mrs Clinton would
be liable to receive the frostiest of welcomes in foreign capitals,
especially in London, where she might be told in no uncertain terms
that she would not be welcome. (On 1st December, The Times of London,
globalist Rupert Murdoch’s mouthpiece, perversely said the exact
opposite, namely that the appointment of this ‘brilliant woman’ would
be enthusiastically welcomed in London, implying either its crass and
culpable ignorance of Queen Melusina’s crimes, or an incompetent
failure to understand that her CIA husband ‘works for’ DVD chieftain
Bush Sr. who has systematically ‘enronised' both the United States and
Britain). How dare this criminal operative purport to tell other
countries what to do when she herself should be behind bars for at
least the 25-year tariff that lesser (banking) criminals were having to
endure due in part to her own open-ended immorality.
•
Irrespective
of her position, she would certainly be eligible for immediate arrest,
incarceration and indictment without further ado: after all, if the
current British Prime Minister can be threatened with arrest (see
below) by Barack Obama even before he has taken over as President, so
can this arrogant Queen Melusina. There are said to be a number of
sealed indictments against this woman.
Of
course the impact of Bush Jr.’s ludicrous theatrical performance was to
reconfirm that this deluded fellow may indeed himself be
indistinguishable these days from a terrified turkey – an impression
reinforced by the parallel fact that on 24th, 25th and 26th November,
President-Elect Obama gave press conferences at which he was
universally seen to be ‘behaving presidentially’ – an impression being
fostered by no means by accident.
OBAMA ADVISED HE MAY HAVE TO ASSUME POWER EARLY
For
Mr Obama has been advised that he must be prepared to assume office
early, if necessary – which is to say that there are indications,
confirmed by several separate sources to this service, that the
prescribed Inauguration Day of 20th January 2008 may be brought
forward, or that the new President may have taken office some time in
advance of that date. This information has not been accompanied by any
elaboration: but it must be obvious that the pressure of events and of
‘the processes’ alluded to above may not allow for the luxury of a
transition period of normal duration.
•
This,
in turn, accounts for the fact that Mr Obama has already assembled the
key members of his team for his first term, although we also know, do
we not, that all the key people are selected by the Intelligence Power
which runs the Government, and its structures, not the other way round.
The team has been assembled 'early' because the Obama Administration
may start early.
Whatever the failing agitpropagandists wanted,
the reality is that, in contrast to earlier presidential elections, the
outcome in November 2008 was decisive – enabling John McCain to escape
from his agony by conceding defeat and making a very generous speech
congratulating his opponent at the earliest possible moment. At 8.20pm
on 6th November, we were further informed that the current Provost
Marshal had retrieved the controversial NESARA (that is, National
Economic Security and Recovery Act) documents from Chief Justice John
Roberts.
NESARA APPARENTLY REMOVED FROM THE EQUATION
Since
the United States now at last possessed (so far as the controlling
Intelligence Power was concerned, at any rate, which was ALL THAT
MATTERED IN PRACTICE) a constitutionally chosen President-Elect, NESARA
was now clearly redundant. It is finished.
•
Criminalist
President Clinton had signed the legislation, WHICH WOULD ONLY COME
INTO EFFECT WHEN ANNOUNCED, in the presence of Navy Seals, who eat
Marines for breakfast.
It contained provisions for the reform of
the United States' finances and the removal from office of the
President, the Vice President and the Cabinet, and their immediate
replacement by an Interim Administration charged with organising
elections within six months. NESARA, by the way, explains the original
nickname applied to Bush Jr. of ‘Temporary’. It had somehow been
assumed that the Clinton legislation, effectively signed under military
duress, would be implemented under Bush Jr.
•
John
Roberts, appointed by Bush Jr. to head the Supreme Court, was briefed
to confiscate and 'sit on' the NESARA papers, presumably because Bush
Jr. saw them as a threat to his rule.
The decisive 2008 election
outcome was of course another reason why John McCain conceded so
promptly. Given the outcome, NESARA was no longer prospectively
‘needed’, so the Chief Justice could no longer ‘justify’ holding on to
the relevant documents, which the current Provost Marshal accordingly
‘confiscated’. President-Elect Barack Obama has since indicated that
the authority of the Provost Marshal is to be strengthened under his
Presidency, or else has made it plain that the holder of this office
has the President-Elect’s full support in the fulfilment of his duties,
which, in the prevailing circumstances, amounts to the same thing.
....................................................................................................
FINALLY, ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS HINT AT THE REAL CRISIS
On
8th November, CNN came closer than ever before to exposing the
institutionalised financial corruption (which, despite everything we
have published, has been continuing, although Bush Sr. himself has
encountered increasing difficulty in identifying counterparties willing
to play financial games with him any more). Specifically, CNN reported
on its One O’Clock News that day that ‘two major banks have been caught
misusing funds. They are having to settle once and for all’.
The
ordinary viewer would not have understood the meaning of ‘once and for
all’: but those aware of the immense pressure for completion of the
Settlements, which President-Elect Obama was known (by 13th November)
to have said ‘must be paid immediately’, will have understood.
•
This,
by the way, reveals that, as has been known for several years (for
certain reasons), CNN has been aware of this nexus of financial
scandals all along.
On 27th November, we were explicitly
informed, and it was duly confirmed, that the US ‘mainstream’ print and
broadcast media had been instructed by Vice President Cheney’s office
to refrain from any mention of these matters whatsoever. Earlier, on
25th November 2008, it had been asserted on MSNBC that Cheney had been
controlling the ‘mainstream’ media throughout his term in office.
These
sudden admissions by ‘mainstream’ outlets did nothing to salvage the
tarnished reputation of the ‘mainstream’, which clearly assumed,
following the election outcome, that it was now ‘safe’ to start hinting
tentatively at the corruption that it has systematically suppressed for
years.
•
What
this means, of course, is that ‘mainstream’ organisations that have
suppressed knowledge of criminal operations and practices in high
places and within the financial structures are de facto
co-conspirators, accessories to the fact of these crimes, and clearly
guilty, in the first instance, of offences under the Misprision of
Felony Statute.
FIFTH ESTATE HAS PERFORMED AN ‘END-RUN’ ROUND THE ‘MAINSTREAM’
They
are uncomfortable because the Fifth Estate (the Internet) has performed
an ‘end-run’ around the ‘mainstream’ (sidestream) media, with the
consequence that millions of thinking Americans and Europeans are now
aware, to some extent, of the existence and implications of this
grandfather of all financial corruption scandals. A visitor newly
arrived from Germany told the Editor on the 29th November of his sense
that many people’s eyes have been opened to the gross criminality of
their governments, of financial institutions, and of holders of high
office across Europe, as well as in the United States. In other words,
the cat is indeed well and truly out of the bag.
BLAIR TOLD HE WOULD NOT BE WELCOME AT CENOTAPH CEREMONY
On
9th November, The Queen and the British nation mourned the dead of the
successive Illuminati wars with the moving annual Cenotaph prayers and
ceremony, which is usually attended also by former Prime Ministers.
This moving ceremony has remained unchanged ever since 1919. On this
occasion, Lady Thatcher was present, walking on the arm of her
successor, Sir John Major.
Also present, of course, were the
Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and the representatives of the other
political parties. But former Prime Minister Tony Blair was absent from
the ceremony. We are informed that Blair was told not to appear.
POWERFUL ‘CHICAGO PEOPLE’ WANT TO BE PAID, TOO
On
13th November 2008 the world was treated to the disturbing spectacle of
five top ‘hedge fund’ managers, believed to be launderers of George
Bush Sr.’s corrupt funds – George Soros, James Simons, John Paulson (no
relation), Philp Falcone and Kenneth Griffin – testifying before Mr
Henry Waxman’s Congressional Committee and blaming the current
financial crisis which of course they have immensely exacerbated thanks
to their exotic and dubious financial excesses, on ‘the system itself’.
As we have previously pointed out, these so-called ‘hedge funds’ are
the ‘venting outlets’ straddling the illicit offshore, off-balance
sheet, untaxed sector, and the ‘visible’ on-balance sheet financial
economy. Large numbers of these funds are now in extreme difficulties
due to avalanches of redemptions; and to stay afloat most have now
closed their doors to further redemptions, locking their investors out,
to the unrestrained fury of many of their number.
•
One
of the giga-managers who testified on 13th November represents a
‘constituency’ that was double-crossed by Bush Sr. He therefore turned,
believe it or not, to Gold Badges for assistance.
Knowledgeable
observers will no doubt understand the significance of this. Suffice it
to say here, that it is factors like this which, taken with other
considerations such as that the ‘Daley people’ in Chicago ‘also want to
be paid’, and in conjunction with the decisive powers exercised by MI6
on behalf of The Queen as a consequence of events described earlier in
this series (and later in the present report), have been driving the
resolution of the Settlements dimension of this crisis.
CLINTON DISMANTLED THE U.S. ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
In
answer to the understandable reiterated question ‘why haven’t these
high-level criminalists been arrested and brought to justice?’, the
interim response that we have ourselves been given is that, during the
Clinton Administration, the enforcement mechanisms were essentially
dismantled.
President
Clinton was effectively appointed by, a client of, and ‘works for’
former President Bush Sr., in a tense relationship that is subject to
periodic eruptions of great fury and is characterised, of course, by
the usual foul ‘Black’ brew of blackmail, intimidation, false witness,
and threats that are characteristic of the Workers of Darkness.
...........................................................................................................
BACKGROUND TO THE G-20 MEETING ON 15TH NOVEMBER 2008
Meanwhile
the world’s media in early November 2008 were becoming more and more
worked up about the preplanned Group of Twenty (G-20) meeting arranged
for Washington, DC, on the 15th November. This meeting was subsequently
reported to have developed and agreed upon a menu of ‘principles’ for
elaborating by officials and technical specialists, to be reviewed in
March 2009 – which of course will be far too late in the day to
forestall calamity, absent other delayed remedies, viz. the Group of
Seven-approved Refinancing Programme, which provides for fully
transparent and on-the-books capital markets transactions which will,
inter alia, deliver huge ongoing windfall tax receipts into the hands
of the US Treasury, and will reverse the one-way deficit financing orgy
that has continued for the past century, enriching all parasitical
intermediaries such as Goldman Sachs in the process, and which can only
be continued as long as international confidence in the US dollar
remains intact, which is no longer the case.
Since
the American Treasury under ‘Paulson’ systematically destroyed that
confidence and fatally jeopardised the ‘Full Faith and Credit’ of the
United States because the highest-level criminalists including
‘Paulson’ himself were concentrating almost exclusively upon exploiting
the fraudulent finance carousel for their own self-enrichment and in
pursuit of their failing globalist hegemony agenda, the open-ended,
one-way deficit-financing orgy is no longer viable.
The
moment is long overdue, therefore, for the G-7-approved Refinancing
Programme to be kick-started, as was supposed to have happened in
June/July 2006, when the original funds were first criminally alienated
by Henry M. Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, who initially
presided over the placement under his sole signatory power with Goldman
Sachs of the $4.5 trillion brought over from the people’s Bank of China
and referenced in the language of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus
(see our reports dated 24th June 2007 and 5th July 2007: Archive).
Following exposure of this scandal by this
service, Paulson ostensibly had to have the funds removed from the
custody of his former employers.
However it is also known that,
although Paulson was only confirmed as US Treasury Secretary on 10th
July 2006, he signed a contract on 20th or 21st June 2006 with respect
to the disposition of the $4.5 trillion. The discovery at the end of
November 2008 that the funds, or some of the funds, were alienated to
Athens, Greece (see below), and the known fact that this transfer
occurred, according to our special informants, ‘about over two years
ago’, suggests that the contract signed by Paulson may have related to
the Athens counterparty.
If that is true, then on the face of
it, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and the Editor of this service, were
comprehensively deceived from the very outset, and used as a front –
not simply when a ‘switch’ occurred at some stage between 24th June
2007, when the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed, and our
appearance at the Alexandria Court hearing on 19th October 2007, as
postulated elsewhere in this report.
And
if THAT is indeed the case, our technique of ‘walking in a straight
line’ is vindicated, since by doing so, we have procured that the
multiple layers of deception have been progressively stripped away over
time, exposing the theft and frauds that followed the transfer of the
original $4.5 trillion by the People’s Bank of China. When truth is
matched against falsehood, the truth always prevails, since lies, like
plutonium, have a half-life and decay. They can never be sustained
indefinitely because they are in conflict with the truth, which can
never be permanently suppressed.
This means that all
intelligence community deception operations are fundamentally stupid
and flawed, as they presuppose that the intended results will be
procured BEFORE the lies have decayed and have been found out – a very
risky assumption. In the present giga-deception, the deceivers have all
been found out because we were on their tail at an early stage and
continued walking in a straight line, while the deceivers, as usual,
zig-zagged. They thought that multiple layers of deception could be
relied upon to provide them with protection. They thought wrong.
BUSH SLOW-HAND-CLAPPED WHEN HE WALKED OUT AFTER AMERO REJECTION
At
the G-20 event in Washington, President George W. Bush attempted,
incredibly, to ‘sell’ the international community on the Bushite plan
for the Amero, thereby providing the first reliable confirmation that
this scheme to impose a common currency on the United States, Canada
and Mexico to replace the US dollar, was among the tricks in the Bush
Crime Family’s magic cabinet.
When the representatives of the
international community indicated in no uncertain terms that this
trick, which would of course improverish them further, and by massive
proportions, would NOT be countenanced or tolerated (i.e., that the
Amero would NOT be accepted by foreign central banks), President George
W. Bush Jr., went into a sulk and walked out of the conference.
As
he left the presence of the G-20 representatives, he was
slow-handclapped out of the door. By this gesture, the international
community FINALLY revealed what they think of this rogue, this mass
murderer, this inveterate thief, this duplicitous little fellow, this
self-serving de facto financial and economic terrorist who has degraded
the United States, its currency and its reputation on a scale with no
historical precedent – this would-be latter-day Herr Hitler who really
had intended to stay in power, we now understand, following an atrocity
that had been planned ahead of the 2008 election.
.........................................................................................................
EDITOR ‘BLEW’ A PLOT TO STAGE A U.S. DOMESTIC ATROCITY
For
we can now reveal that on 27th November 2008 we were advised that ‘a
long time ago’ Bush 43 and Vice President Richard Cheney had resolved
to have Mr Christopher Story removed from the scene or ‘taken down’ in
some unspecified manner. When the Editor enquired why he had not been
told this earlier, there was no answer. When the Editor asked why
whatever they had had in mind had not been implemented while the Editor
was in Washington and New York in October 2008, he was told that ‘you
were protected by too many of The Queen’s people’ on the ground.
When
the Editor enquired as to precisely what had caused the President and
the Vice President of the United States to decree, so to speak, that
the Editor should be ‘taken down’, he was told words to the effect that
‘you blew their plan to stage an atrocity as a pretext for imposing
martial law and following through by cancelling the election and
implementing a de facto dictatorship’.
This
appears to have been a reference to allusions inter alia to prospective
atrocities published in our report dated 25th October 2007, including
the fears of a Twin Cities atrocity that may have been planned to
coincide with the commencement of the Republican National Convention to
be held on 1st September 2008, and to the matter of the missing nuclear
weapon, which we did mention ONCE but only because the matter had
already been extensively covered elsewhere: so that can hardly have
been the key trigger that 'blew' the conspiracy. Revelation of the Twin
Cities plot was a much more likely candidate. Note: We did, separately,
report recently that Bush 41 was believed to have demanded that the
Editor of this service be ‘removed from the equation’.
However the first that we and associates heard of
any possible Bush-Cheney intention to interfere with the Editor and
this service was in January/February 2008. The ‘shootings’ episodes at
the turn of last year, which certainly involved deaths but possibly of
at least one double, may have been a part of this operation, with the
objective of discrediting the opponents of the financial criminality in
high places. It is possible that this intention remained pending for
eight months or so, until certain decisive steps were taken in Britain
by the Editor of this service on behalf of his US associates in
September 2008, which put an end to any such intentions. Certainly, the
Editor was not interfered with when attending the IMF Spring Meetings
in April 2008, and subsequently while residing in New York. Thus, such
intentions appear to have been overruled, or overtaken by events.
POLITICIANS TRYING TO GET PAID BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE
With
the roof collapsing on top of them as the full force of these exposures
slaps them in the face, corrupt Washington politicians were reported to
us on 2nd December to be scrambling to impose their will on those in
charge of the Settlements payouts, holding out their filthy hands for
money in the hope of having funds channelled to their 'foundations', in
payment for 'services rendered', i.e. corruption, before any payments
to Trustees and others were or could be made. However the real reason
for this revolting spectacle is believed to be fear among these rats
that they won't be paid at all, if they aren't paid first. Never in
world history has such a despicable bunch of corrupt hacks behaved in
such a primitive, unseemly way. They have no shame: they want 'their'
money, so they can get out. And they want to get out because it's
terribly hot inside. But they want 'their' money.
Very late on
2nd December, the Editor was authoritatively informed that the 'Big
Boys' were to be paid on 3rd December. The phrase 'Big Boys' in this
context means the corrupt Washington, DC, politicians. When the Editor
asked for an indication of their identities, names like Kennedy, Dodd,
Bush Jr., Clinton and other well-known political crooks were mentioned.
Christopher Dodd is the grandson of Stalin (Josef Djiugashvili-Kochba),
in case you had forgotten.
•
Has
a more revolting spectacle than the thought of these pigs sticking
their filthy snouts in the trough ahead of the rightful Trustees, ever
disturbed your personal equilibrium?
VERY SERIOUS QUESTIONS THAT GEITHNER HAS TO ANSWER
In
late November, it became known that Mr Obama had selected Timothy
Geithner, currently President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
as his nominee for US Treasury Secretary.
It is known that
this man is currently being ‘watched like a hawk’, given his
association with Robert Rubin, the Clintons’ operative guarding their
illicit interests at Citibank, in midtown Manhattan. As late as Friday
21st November 2008, Robert Rubin was reported to have interfered with
Settlement payments. Obviously, even one of Bush Jr.’s pardoned turkeys
would be an improvement over the serial financial criminal, Henry M.
Paulson, or his double, whom Timothy Geithner will be replacing,
provided the new Senate can approve his credentials. But is that
possible?
For
serious questions arise in connection with this selection, notably
concerning Gaithner’s past exercise of his fiduciary responsibilities,
his ethical record, and whether he, like so many of these people, has
been, for instance, in breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute.
Since
we are concerned about economic terrorism having been relentlessly
waged against the United Kingdom, in particular, by the familiar bunch
of US criminals in the highest places, these questions necessitate the
closest possible consideration, which we believe may be being given to
them by the empanelled judicial processes mentioned earlier.
It
will be recalled in this context that following lodgement of the
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Alexandria [Civil Action No: 1-07 CV 609 –
TSE – BRP: see text published in our reports dated 24th June 2007 and
5th July 2007: Archive] demanding performance in respect of the missing
$4.5 trillion that was sent over in good faith by the People’s Bank of
China, the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond had responded that the
Petitioner’s remedy lay within the jurisdiction of the United States
Eastern District of New York.
•
The relevant passage of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reads as
follows:
“In
May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and
unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through
international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of
America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of
the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was
Petitioner herein. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of
China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned
[Wanta] settlement agreement. Upon best information and belief between
the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States
Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the
remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of
China transferred financial assets from Bank of America, Richmond,
Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank New
York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by
the People’s Republic of China referenced above.
This
“Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from
Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal
Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of
Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the
People’s Republic of China.
The
transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al. account at Citibank put a lawless
restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner
without the authorization of United States Treasury”.
This
passage is also reproduced on page 57 of International Currency Review
Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, the huge double issue mailed to the
international financial community worldwide on 14th July 2008, under
the heading: ‘DIVERSION OF WANTA-OWNED FUNDS REMITTED BY CHINESE’.
WHY RICHMOND FED SAID THAT REMEDY LIES WITHIN THE NEW YORK JURISDICTION
In
our reported posted on 25th October 2007 [see Archive], under the
heading ‘CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS’, we published
the full text of a last-minute Affidavit submitted to the Court by
Attorney Steven Goodwin, whose Richmond office was the Registered
Office of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, in which various convoluted reasoning
was advanced to explain why the documents generated as a consequence of
the Petition were never seen by the Petitioner.
•
Our
report of 25th October 2007 contained, however, a reference to a
hearing that the Petitioner ostensibly, therefore, never knew about,
dated 7th September 2007.
•
The relevant language of our report referenced:
‘The
Response filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and heard by
Judge Ellis... on 7th September, wherein the Richmond Fed suggested
that the remedy... lies within the jurisdiction of the United States
Eastern District Court of New York’.
THE REAL REASON OUR 4TH OCTOBER 2007 REPORT WAS ‘SNIPPED’
Our
report dated 25th October 2007 then stated that our related report
dated 4th October 2007 had been ‘snipped’, and at the time we thought
over-hastily that this had probably occurred ‘because it characterises
Citibank as a criminal enterprise’. We elaborated with words to the
effect that it was quite stupid of Fort Meade to ‘snip’ this report,
given that in so doing it appeared to confirm the accuracy of this
statement. However, as has now become apparent, there were much more
telling reasons why our report dated 4th October 2007 [see Archive] had
been ‘snipped’. For that report also contained the following language:
‘Given
that the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond accepts ‘all well pleaded
facts as true’, the Richmond Fed further reconfirmed, in the most
authoritative manner possible, that the funds had been placed with an
account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank, New York... In its
Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, the US Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond elaborated that [the Petitioner] ‘has an adequate remedy
under Article 4A (Funds Transfer) of the Uniform Commercial Code by
demanding that Citibank release to him the funds held’ by that bank
‘for his benefit’'.
In
other words, the relevant funds were held within the jurisdiction of
the United States Court for the Eastern District of New York, namely
the jurisdiction within which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, of
which Timothy Gaithner was President, resides.
PANTOMIME ANTICS AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURT HEARING
Now,
at the hearing at the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Alexandria held on 19th October 2007 that your
correspondent attended, Judge Ellis was not at all impressed with the
behaviour of the Petitioner on the witness stand, so much so that the
Judge more or less ignored everything said from the stand. At the time,
the Editor thought this was very odd.
The reason for this
behaviour, it has now transpired, is that another deal may have been
done at some stage between the lodgement of the Petition in late June
2007 and the hearing on the 19th October, whereby the funds had been
diverted to Athens, Greece. It was therefore ‘necessary’ to bring the
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus proceedings to an indeteriminate
conclusion, as it had ‘reached its sell-by date’.
•
NOTE:
However it is suggested elsewhere that the funds were alienated to
Athens much earlier, in which case the matter of the way we were
deceived is much more serious, as in that case we would have been
deceived from the outset. Either way, the deceivers deserve no sympathy.
This
explains why it then became necessary for the Petitioner ‘to part
company with Christopher Story’ (as he put it to Michael C. Cottrell,
M.S.), whom the Petitioner called ‘an honest journalist, which is very
rare’ (in a telephone conversation during the first quarter of 2008).
In other words, the services of this ‘honest journalist’
were now an impediment to the Petitioner’s interests, since a possibly
parallel deal (see below) may have been done with Cheney et al. behind
the scenes while the legal process was continuing, and an ‘honest
journalist’, Christopher Story, could not possibly be informed of this
fact and would be liable to 'get in the way' now.
•
This
background also explains why the Petitioner angrily told the Editor in
a fractured telephone conversation in March 2008 that 'YOU HAVE
DESTROYED EVERYTHING'.
•
For ‘everything’ here, read the illegal diversion of the funds, inter
alia to Athens (see below).
ROBERT RUBIN RAN THE MONEY – AND THE DIVERSIONS
This
diversion had been orchestrated by the corrupt former President
Clinton’s main mole inside Citibank/Citigroup, one Robert Rubin, the
former US Treasury Secretary, who authored a prominent article
published in the Wall Street Journal dated 29th November, the theme of
which was ‘It’s not my fault’. [The Editor calls the habit that these
people routinely adopt of protesting too much when cornered,
‘Blankfeinism’, after the display of supreme arrogance by Paulson’s
successor as CEO at Goldman Sachs, Mr Blankfein, who boasted in the
summer of 2007 about how well his institution had been doing, when of
course it had been engaged in dodgy financial manipulations as exposed
inter alia by this service].
Confirmation
that the original $4.5 trillion funds were diverted by Robert Rubin
from Citibank to an account or accounts located in Athens, and that the
funds had been so diverted for perhaps two + years, was obtained by
this service between 11.30pm and midnight on Wednesday 26th November
2008. For their part, certain Greek parties could not understand what
on earth was going on, with some concluding that the Americans had gone
completely mad. Whether the transactions were in any way facilitated by
John Negroponte, of Greek Jewish extraction, and /or by Olga
Sarantopoulos, is not known at this juncture.
It
may also be recalled that in the late fall of 2007, the Treasurer of
the United States, Ms. Anna Escobedo Cabral, held a meeting with Robert
Rubin at Citibank, which she was reported to have left in a seriously
discontented frame of mind. It was even rumoured that Ms. Cabral had
indicated that she would not stand for this endless corruption any
longer, would do her best to procure the Settlements, and would then
resign. What the US Treasurer is believed to have found out during that
meeting was that certain missing funds had been diverted to Athens.
Reverberations
from this and related scandals were still roiling Citibank/Citigroup,
one of the CIA’s favoured 'helpful' institutions, as late as
mid-November 2008. On the 13th November, the institution issued the
following brief statement:
‘The Board of Directors of
Citigroup Inc. today reiterated its full support for the company’s
chairman, Sir Win Bischoff, and said it looks forward to its continued
leadership. This morning’s Wall Street Journal report to the contrary
is completely erroneous’.
The ‘erroneous’ report had referenced
allegations that senior Citigroup staff members had been unhappy with
Sir Win’s oversight of Chief Executive Vikram Pandit and his management
team, and had suggested that Dick Parsons, the bank’s senior
independent director, was possibly being lined up to replace Sir Win
Bischoff, who was parachuted into Citibank in part to serve inter alia
as the guardian of The Queen’s loan funds with the bank.
But in
translation, it can be seen that the pressure on Robert Rubin will have
been intense, and that a belated rearguard action may have been mounted
to ‘rid the bank’ of HM The Queen’s de facto representative and of the
influence of MI6 in procuring the necessary overdue resolution of the
Settlements dimension of this vast crisis, without collapsing Citibank
and causing thereby a worldwide depression (the ‘ace’ that Robert Rubin
has of course been cynically playing). On 21st November, Rubin was
STILL reported, as noted, to have tried hard to block the Settlements.
GEITHNER MUST DIVULGE WHAT HE KNEW ABOUT THESE DIVERSIONS
The
problem facing Timothy Geithner is that, as President of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, he will need to explain to a Senate hearing
that is doing its job properly, and almost certainly to the empanelled
‘judicial processes’, exactly what was his involvement in these various
criminal diversions of other people’s money. He will also need to
answer questions about how it came to pass that profits illegally
derived from the stealing of Her Majesty The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th
March 2007 came to be deposited inter alia in secret ‘offshore’,
off-balance sheet accounts held at Citibank for Bush Sr. (41), Bush Jr.
(43), William Jefferson Clinton (42), Mrs Hillary Clinton, Henry M.
Paulson, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Robert Rubin, Dr Alan
Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, and other high-level crooks as
beneficiaries. This information came from top US military sources.
•
YES,
the top criminalists MADE MONEY OUT OF THE STEALING OF THE QUEEN'S GOLD
and placed their portions of the proceeds in their illegal, untaxed,
off-balance sheet hidden accounts with the CIA's primary
money-laundering criminal enterprise, Citibank. WHICH IS TO SAY, that
the Bushes, Clintons, Cheney, Paulson et al. were ALL engaged in
FINANCING TERRORISM and in ECONOMIC TERRORISM against Her Majesty the
Queen and the British State and people.
•
In other words,
these top criminals, who rant and rave about global terrorism, are
themselves veteran terrorists, engaged in the financing of terrorism by
their own definitions, illustrating once again the double-mindedness of
these snakes. AND, TO COIN A PHRASE, IT GETS MUCH WORSE:
PROVOST MARSHAL BARRED FROM ENTERING SECRET ROOM INSIDE MORGAN STANLEY
In
October 2007, the Provost Marshal of the day, with appropriate back-up,
visited the offices of Morgan Stanley in New York City. We alluded to
the activities of the Provost Marshal extensively in our reports dated
between 4th October 2007 and 11th November 2007 [see Archive]. The
Provost Marshal at that time was under the control of (criminal) Vice
President Richard B. Cheney.
Our impeccable sources were unable to inform the Editor, but are now
able to inform us, that:
•
The
Provost Marshal and his team attempted to obtain entry to a locked room
inside the Morgan Stanley building. They were specifically barred from
entering this room, by Morgan Stanley staff, who stood outside the
doors and prevented them from entering.
•
The purpose of the
Provost Marshal's demand for entry to this room was to obtain back-up
evidence that Morgan Stanley, the CEO of which remains John Mack, was
engaged in financing terrorism operations in general, and Al-Qaeda in
particular, from this room.
•
How did the Provost Marshal
know this? Because following the arrests bankers in Europe which we
also reported during that period, investigators had obtained
tear-sheets PROVING that such terrorism financing operations were being
run out of this room at Morgan Stanley. Specifically, the tear-sheets
carried the finger-prints of the following criminal operatives holding
the highest US offices: George H. W. Bush Sr., Vice President Richard
B. Cheney, Henry M. Paulson Jr., Dr. Alan Greenspan, William Jefferson
Clinton, and Mrs Hillary Clinton (these being the names confirmed to
us, but of course there were others, too). The tear-sheets referenced
key secret bank accounts, access to which was blocked off and which the
Provost Marshal, controlled by Cheney at the time, was unable to
inspect. At the time, our sources were ordered NOT to convey this
information to us.
SECRET ROOM FROM WHICH AL-QAEDA AND OTHER TERRORIST OPERATIONS WERE
FUNDED
We
are told that this room housed contracts and other documents relating
to the use of funds in the secret bank accounts referenced immediately
above.
The operations directed from this secret Morgan Stanley
room or office suite were concerned SPECIFICALLY with the
terrorist-financing of Al-Qaeda and other international terrorism
operations, according to our sources. This means that, as stated above,
ALL those named by military sources as beneficiaries of the secret
'offshore' accounts, headed by Mr Paulson as US Treasury Secretary,
were engaged in the diversion of illicit funds for the purposes of
financing terrorism and Al-Qaeda, which the United States and Britain
routinely blame for the terrorist abominations that are being financed
through these operations run out of the secret office inside Morgan
Stanley.
•
Thus
it is finally determined that the world's most dangerous revolutionary
pariah state is indeed the United States, with the United Kingdom, in a
disreputable and reprobate breach with what Great Britain is supposed
to stand for, aiding and abetting these hideous, murderous
abominations.
•
No wonder Blair's 'confession' is reported to be causing these odious
criminals nightmares.
Therefore,
the Directors of Morgan Stanley and of Citibank stand accused of being
engaged in the FINANCING OF TERRORISM, along with Messrs Bush Sr., Bush
Jr., the former President Clinton, Mrs Hillary Clinton (who may soon be
pontificating all over the world's stage excoriating Al-Qaeda and even
banging on about Osama Bin Laden (the CIA's 'Tim Osman') whom these
fools have to keep alive in order to sustain their strategic deception,
even though he died on 26th December 2001), Vice President Richard B.
Cheney, the former and current Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board,
Drs. Greenspan and Bernanke, Robert Rubin and other co-conspirators in
this BIGGEST FINANCIAL CORRUPTION, TERRORISM AND POLITICAL SCANDAL IN
WORLD HISTORY.
CHENEY RAN THE MEDIA, RUBIN RAN THE MONEY
In
the above context, it was reconfirmed with the same batch of
intelligence that Vice President Cheney had been ‘running the media’
while Robert Rubin had been ‘running the money’ – all of which had been
going on while we were steadily chipping away at the endless
deceptions, lies, diversionary tactics and obfuscations with our
‘Wantagate’ reports, and thereafter.
The Sunday Times, London,
of 30th November 2008, carried an extensive article which accurately
confirmed that President-Elect Obama had been obliged to seize the
initiative so as to fill the de facto vacuum at the top in the United
States, given that every strand of US policy has long been atrophied by
the corrupt behaviour of the holders of the highest offices, who have
done hardly anything since mid-2006 except manipulate the illicit
movement of funds so as to extract as much money for lining their own
pockets as possible, and to satisfy and make whole the furious demands
and elevated expectations of heinous, ruthless ‘Black Ops’ interests
and of innumerable corrupt constituencies who have been double-crossed
by the ‘Box Gang’ (the Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus).
........................................................................................................
OBAMA OSTENSIBLY INSISTING ON FINAL SETTLEMENT IN FULL
On
Monday 24th November 2008, the President-Elect signed papers requiring
the Settlements to be implemented. In the batch of information received
late on 26th November, it was confirmed that Mr Obama has been
insisting on settlement, a fact that had been confirmed to us earlier
in an email dated 13th November 2008 (received at 01:47am) from a
Trustee to the effect that that ‘Obama has said we must be paid
immediately’.
The
sources stated, and it was later confirmed, that Mr Obama has been
absolutely appalled at what he had found out following his election
victory and that his shock has been all the greater because he had
realised that Vice President-Elect Biden had known all about this
open-ended criminality.
The Editor speculates that it has been
the shock of these discoveries of this wall-to-wall deception,
corruption and blatant criminality, that accounts for Obama's
compulsion (given the unprecedented and extraordinary circumstances of
this crisis) to ‘act presidentially’.
Americans use this
phrase rather loosely and perhaps a trifle cynically. But here, the
gravity of the chaos and the corruption is so extreme that the incoming
President was immediately left with no option but to respond in a
responsible and vigorous manner. Which he did.
It
is also true, of course, that in presiding over the Settlements and
procuring the implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme,
the President-Elect will ensure that the disaster that otherwise awaits
his Presidency will in fact be transformed over time into a triumphant
success.
This is NOT play-acting: it implies confirmation of
strength of character, determination, an iron will and of a man who,
whatever faults he like everyone else may possess, has immediately
risen to the immense challenges that he ‘unexpectedly’ faces given the
circumstances and the derailing of the various schemes and plots to
have him removed from the scene. After the Bush Jr. White House had
tried to bribe him, Mr Obama must have entertained no remaining doubts
about the extreme gravity of the Republic’s crisis, and must have been
reinforced in his belief in his mission to help the United States climb
out of the worst outbreak of financial iniquity the Republic has ever
faced.
On
Saturday 22nd November 2008, a week after the G-20 meeting and after
George Bush Jr. had finally ceased his resistance (so it was being
said, not that Mr Bush had any power to resist left), the 'country
payees' received what was grossly overdue to them in cash. We realise
that there have been earlier occasions when 'the countries' were
reported to have been paid (which have turned out to be occasions when
their dollar funds were on-screen but not accessed): but the point here
is that this information concerning ‘wholesale’ payments was received
over the weekend of 22nd-23rd November, and ‘confirmed’ by separate
sources on 1st December 2008.
For the countries to have been
paid, a key Tier Two US Trustee must have needed to deploy his
instruments, which were integral to the countries being paid. This
information was accompanied by indications that US Treasury securities
had been issued for the Settlement throughout the week following the
G-20 meeting, with Tier Three payees therefore likely to be paid with
Treasuries.
A
caveat applies to all such information, however, namely that, given
‘banking secrecy’, none of this can be verified, even though some such
information is ‘confirmed’: it is all, by definition, based on hearsay
– which is why we have usually avoided referencing such ‘intelligence’.
But at this late stage, some indication of what is supposed to have
been happening, is necessary. A key Trustee payable with the countries,
should have been paid, at the latest, on or by Sunday 30th November.
OBAMA 'WORKING IN ‘LOCK-STEP’ WITH SARKOZY AND MI6'
Mr
Obama’s ‘presidential’ behaviour has been buttressed by the fact that
President Sarkozy of France, who is also President of the European
Union until 31st December this year, and Britain’s MI6 (elements truly
serving HM The Queen) are working in lock-step with the President-Elect
to procure finalisation of the Settlements, not least in conformity
with the instructions and deadline imposed upon the French President
requiring him to fulfil his new ‘mandate to pay’ obtained when
President Bush Jr. finally ceded what he thought was still his
authority in the matter, as previously described by this service.
Unfortunately,
both the President-Elect and President Sarkozy encountered further
resistance – not from Chancellor Merkel – who as we reported in
October, had been on Mr Bush Sr.’s corrupt payroll for four years in
exchange for ‘looking after’ Bush-linked funds that we now know were
flowing to and from Deutsche Bank and the Vatican Bank (controlled by
Merkel’s agent there, Dr Hans Tietmeyer) via the de facto clearing
house in London, Coutts Bank – but from the current British Prime
Minister, GORDON BROWN.
GORDON BROWN CONFIRMED AS IMPEDING THE SETTLEMENTS
PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OMABA THREATENS BROWN WITH ARREST
The
batch of intelligence obtained by this service between 11.30pm and
midnight UK time on that Wednesday 26th November, all of which was
confirmed to be 100% accurate (with the exception of an allegation that
active Gold Badges had been instructed to ‘take Story down’, an
instruction that is now believed to be redundant anyway), contained the
following:
•
Gordon Brown had lately been impeding
finalisation of the Settlements: in other words there has been no
discontinuity between Blair and Brown in respect of the sabotage; and:
•
President-Elect
Obama sent an agent over to London to speak directly to the Prime
Minister with the following stark message: If you interfere any further
with the Settlements payouts, YOU WILL BE ARRESTED. In this connection,
Barack Obama will have issued this warning with the full authority of
Sarkozy, equipped with his said ‘mandate to pay’, backed by the ‘right’
MI6 elements.
When
we obtained confirmation of this intelligence, we were advised that
‘relevant parties’ had become aware that someone at very high level in
London must have been ‘standing in the way’, given that almost all
other known blockages had been removed, with many arrests having taken
place across Europe during November, as in the preceding several months.
On
24th November, we had another episode of the ‘waiting for bank
answerbacks’ syndrome, it being confirmed later that one bank had
failed to provide the necessary answerback, as a direct consequence of
which the banker in question had been arrested. There is a suspicion
that this sabotage occurred in London and may have been directly
connected to the fact that Mr Brown was found to have been impeding the
Settlements.
•
NOTE:
It remains possible that what has been happening is an expanded version
of the 'pass the parcel' technique whereby the scene constantly shifts
between the players, with the spotlight then directed from one to the
next one, while the action has already moved to the subsequent crook: a
more extensive game than was being played by the highest-level
criminalists in 2007 and earlier in 2008, when 'A' 'washes his hands'
of the matter and then points to 'B', who has carefully developed his
alibi while the action is being corruptly handled by 'C', as the
spotlight lingers on 'B'. That model was seen in the US context:
perhaps it is now being applied internationally, with the overall aim
of sabotaging performance.
•
Last week it was Sarkozy. This week it's Brown. Next week, its Bush
again.
After all, these rats, as previously advised, are all out of the same
sewer.
•
In any given sewer, each rat is different, yet every rat is the same
colour. All of them stink.
SUDDEN REHABILITATION OF MANDELSON 'EXPLAINED'
We
are led to believe that the discovery, at this latest of all stages,
that Gordon Brown had been impeding the Settlements, has placed this
Prime Minister in the same position as his predecessor during his final
months in office, when he was under extreme pressure from sources in
authority to step down from Downing Street. Given this state of
affairs, some new light is hereby thrown on the sudden reappearance of
two sinister characters at the centre of the Government in Whitehall
and Downing Street. We refer to:
•
Peter [now Lord]
Mandelson, who was suddenly pulled out of Brussels, where he had been
serving as European Trade Commissioner, and has surfaced as Business
Secretary at the very centre of the Government, with at times nowadays
a higher profile than the Prime Minister.
Mandelson is believed to be a direct Rothschild
agent and operates with a brief that will ‘go nowhere' (see below), to
push the Brown Government into ditching the pound in favour of the
Euro, a line now openly supported by the compromised President of the
European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. Given that the Prime
Minister, Gordon Brown, has recently been ‘fingered’ obstructing the
Settlements, he may now see capitulation on this central issue as his
own route to salvation and as a means of wreaking revenge on The Queen.
More generally, as this grandfather of all financial corruption crises
unravels, powerful interests are finding their positions threatened,
oligarchs are being cut down to size or wiped out, and the furniture is
being thrown all around the room, much of it broken into smaller pieces
or even ground to dust.
•
Alistair Campbell, Tony Blair’s notorious former ‘press agent’, a.k.a.
chief intelligence handler, who has suddenly reappeared in Number 10
Downing Street, we understand.
It
is possible that the reappearance of these people may have had
something to do with Gordon Brown’s irregular behaviour, which we first
identified in the following paragraph published in the report dated
18th June 2008:
WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING EARLIER
SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES ON THE STEPS OF DOWNING STREET?
We
will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown,
who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up
to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the
tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they
arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to
President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence
there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.
•
REMARKABLE FACT: The Editor was subsequently
informed that this observation alerted the relevant US and British
authorities to the fact that Bush flew to Northern Ireland precisely to
open bank accounts and that Brown was associated with this activity.
Many weeks later the Editor was told that Brown had subsequently been
‘educated’.
… However it now appears, given the intelligence
received and confirmed on 26th November 2008, that Brown did not learn
his lessons well, i.e., the fool paid no attention (3).
We
believe, therefore, that Gordon Brown is now de facto a ‘lame duck’ – a
NEW fact which, very surprisingly, seems already to have been sensed by
certain ‘mainstream’ outlets, given one or two sudden reversals
performed by journalists in respect of their assessments of Mr Brown’s
political position. For, all of a sudden, after the Prime Minister had
been at the receiving end of a peculiar avalanche of domestic and
international praise for his ‘robust’ response to the crisis (which he
and his predecessor helped to generate), we read that his standing has
declined sharply as economic and financial conditions have deteriorated
ever more steeply during the past couple of weeks.
[Note:
In an obvious attempt to reverse the impression created by earlier
opinion polls, a new poll published in The Daily Telegraph on Tuesday
2nd December suggested that the Conservatives' poll lead over the
Labour Government had collapsed to just 1%. It should be recalled that
these opinion polls are actually a device to enable the 'controllers'
to see which way the wind is blowing, but that they are also used to
confuse the people, to sway the thinking of gullible journalists, and
to trim the perceptions of targeted constituencies, in order to
fine-tune (in this case) an evolving and highly charged political
situation, in which many senior figures' careers may be on the line].
BROWN IMPEDING, MANDELSON SUPPOSEDLY ALLEVIATING
The
situation described above is even more convoluted when one considers
the contrasting overt behaviour of the Prime Minister and of Lord
Mandelson, the Rothschild agent he has hauled back from Brussels and
installed in the Cabinet at the centre of Government as Business
Secretary.
On the one hand (see above), Gordon Brown is found
to have been impeding the outstanding settlements payouts – even though
we have been advised that, as of 22nd November, President Bush Jr. had
finally ‘agreed’ to the releases, notwithstanding that he had weeks
earlier provided President Sarkozy with an irrevocable ‘mandate to pay’
– while on the other hand Mr Brown's newly appointed Business Secretary
has been issuing rapid-fire edicts and statements purporting to signal
the British Government’s ‘commitment’ to the struggling industrial and
business sectors.
But on closer inspection it would appear that Lord
Mandelson’s stance is curiously ambivalent. For instance, he told The
Sunday Telegraph (30th November 2008) that he had submitted a
preliminary paper to the Labour Party’s National Economic Council in
late November which he explained as follows: ‘I made the point that
there has to be a screening process to distinguish between those
[industries] which are viable and those which are not. But we also need
to take account of our own resources and European state aid rules’.
So,
leaving aside the fact that President-Elect Obama had to take the
extraordinary step of sending an emissary to Number 10 Downing Street
to inform the Prime Minister directly that if he continued to block the
settlements, WHICH ARE THE SOLUTION TO LORD MANDELSON’S PROBLEMS over
the medium term as the G-7 Approved Refinancing Programme will generate
the necessary flow of on-the-books liquidity to refinance the US and
European banks on the books, the overt position at the very end of
November 2008 was that (a) the Prime Minister had been SABOTAGING the
ONLY available solution, while (b) his former enemy, Peter Mandelson,
who must surely be aware of this, was busily setting limits and citing
obstacles to the provision of state assistance to Britain’s rapidly
crumbling business and industrial sectors. At the very least, this does
suggest a truly constipated, dislocated directorate at the centre of
British governance which needs to be swept away if the country is not
indeed to sink into a depression which could make 1929 look like a
seaside holiday.
ECONOMIC TERRORISTS IN DOWNING STREET?
But
at worst, the two most powerful figures in the British Government,
Gordon Brown and Lord Mandelson, had themselves been exacerbating
Britain’s problems by blocking (at least until late November) the
Settlements payouts, thereby assisting the interests of the
Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate and the Octopus, which in turn implies
that both these characters may themselves be engaged in perpetrating
economic terrorism against the Monarch, the United Kingdom and its
people, and should therefore be arrested under the European
anti-terrorism laws adopted by the Westminster Parliament: which,
presumably, is what President-Elect Barack Obama had in mind when, with
the support of President Sarkozy and MI6, he had to despatch a special
emissary to inform Mr Brown that he would be arrested if he continued
to block the Settlements.
There
may indeed, therefore, be the soundest reasons for believing that the
very sudden transfer of Mandelson (previously a sworn enemy of Mr
Brown, and a man who is known to have excoriated Brown in the past,
behind his back, in the most bitter terms), to the very epicentre of
the Brown Labour Government, appears to represent a defiant and
desperate move by the Prime Minister to wrap ‘European’ protection
around himself while at the same time appearing to be ‘getting back at’
The Queen, and effectively ‘changing sides’ – a stance apparently
reinforced by the sudden reappearance of Blair’s former ‘handler’,
Alistair Campbell, in Downing Street.
•
If
so, Gordon Brown may have been sharply disabused of this thinking or
strategy, as on 2nd December The Financial Times reported that the
Prime Minister had 'quashed' Barroso's claim that the economic crisis
was driving Britain to abandon sterling and 'find refuge with' the
Euro. Mr Brown's spokesman (INTERESTINGLY, he was not named, which is
VERY UNUSUAL, implying that this was a PLANTED article) was said to
have 'been forced by Barroso's remarks' to state that there are 'no
plans' for Britain to join the European Collective Currency.
•
'Changing
sides' among the operatives on the stage is all the rage during this
'discontinuity' period, when the correlation of forces is being shaken
from top to bottom. It may explain, for instance, the appearance of Mrs
Clinton as prospective Secretary of State under Barack Obama. More
significantly, however, the trade-off here incorporates the following
equation: Mrs Clinton may believe she is 'safe' from the consequences
of her crimes if confirmed by the Senate, while in exchange Mr Obama
will know that SHE knows she cannot step out of line, or she will be
'chopped' by the President-Elect, whereupon she will immediately be
vulnerable to arrest and its aftermath.
Operative
Campbell ostensibly serves John Scarlett of MI6, whose notorious
orientation towards the European Union Collective (the long-range
Abwehr/DVD anti-nation state strategic entrapment instrument) is well
known. MI6 appears to be split, as would be expected, along similar
fault lines as the criminal enterprise known as the CIA – between the
pro-pan-German faction, and those who still try, against immense odds,
but do quite well in the grim circumstances, loyally to serve their
home countries and their Heads of State.
If
the foregoing analysis is reasonably accurate, any such plot to
leverage the present situation to yank Britain out of sterling and into
the Euro will fail.
The reason is that Britain can never
abandon the pound, which was one of the world currencies designated at
Bretton Woods to operate in parallel with the US dollar. The
international trading system cannot allow the pound to cease to exist
because it is a mainstay with the dollar, and now China, of the
international trading system. For international trading arrangements to
function, there must be at least two world currencies in the mix, to
allow offsetting to take place. The Euro cannot be used as a mainstay
currency for this purpose as it is a wholly artificial currency that is
supported by both nothing and no government. The yen can be used for
offsetting purposes, but it was not a currency that was available when
the Bretton Woods system was established as Japan was an Axis country
and its currency was of course anathema.
Hence,
all talk of Britain joining the Euro – which it is now quite possible
Brown may have suddenly sought to embrace behind the scenes, given the
pressure he is under following his treachery with Bush last June and
his blocking of the Settlements – is eyewash.
For EC President
Barroso to wade in with verbal pressure designed to take advantage of
Brown’s predicament, smells of a hopeless rearguard response. That
leaves the question: who, then, will take over if Brown has to go? And
the answer, on this analysis, would be Mandelson – if that had not been
precluded (unless he renounces his new peerage) by the fact that he is
in the House of Lords. Mandelson may well be operating in conjunction
with Messrs Barroso and Rothschild to try to ‘bounce’ Britain into the
Euro, but this endeavour, like Brown’s premiership, is doomed.
All
of which illuminates what Brown was REALLY up to when he bounded around
the world stage and received a substantial, but very fragile, uplift in
the British domestic public opinion polls (the mechanism used by the
'controllers' to gauge the way the wind is blowing), as the gale-force
winds of this crisis assumed hurricane proportions.
He was
promoting A NEW BRETTON WOODS, so that the unique position of the pound
sterling laid down in the Bretton Woods agreement could then be
scrapped, the continued existence of the old Bretton Woods Agreement
being an irremovable impediment to the DVD's project for scrapping the
pound. Now that this little ruse has been exposed, and you are for the
high-jump, Mr Brown, your clumsy behaviour in seeking to have the
existing Bretton Woods Agreement swept away, is DEAD IN THE WATER,
mate. You were trying to be 'too clever by half', and you messed up BIG
TIME.
SIGNS OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CRACKING UP
Turning
to the concomitant collapse of the economy, quite apart from the daily
headline news about well-known high street and corporate names in
severe financial trouble, there are ominous signs that the real
economy’s distribution system is on the verge of breaking down.
•
According
to experts on classical Rome, the primary factor, aside from decadence,
that brought Rome to its knees – leaving vast tracts of the city itself
abandoned and deserted for a millennium and more – was the
disintegration of the distribution system.
The Romans had
perfected certain mass production techniques for goods in widespread
demand, such as vessels for the transportation of wine, roof tiles,
domestic housewares, shoes and other products, which depended upon an
efficient system of distribution to reach their markets.
Archaeologists
have long since taken note of the sharp deterioration in the quality
of, say, roof tiles that took place somewhat abruptly in the fourth
century or earlier. The main reason for this rapid deterioration is
believed to be that the distribution system collapsed, which in turn
brought the mass production operations to a halt.
•
People
in need of roofing tiles were therefore reduced either to stealing them
from abandoned buildings, turning to local sources of manufacture, or
making the artefacts themselves.
On 18th November, Atradius, the
United Kingdom’s largest credit insurer, confirmed that it was clawing
back the insurance offered to suppliers to at least 12,000 British
businesses. The insurer provides cover against non-payment of bills for
goods supplied on credit.
The Financial Times reported on 19th
November that one broker had said that the withdrawal by the Atradius
corporation was ‘unprecedented in my life’, adding that up to 20,000
British corporations may have been affected over the preceding two
weeks alone. Another broker asserted that the UK construction, retail
and leisure sectors had been affected and that the Government might
soon have to provide credit or insurance to struggling suppliers.
Smaller
suppliers typically, and usually with good reason, do not trust larger
corporations, which place orders for goods to be supplied on credit, to
meet their obligations, on time or at all. So to mitigate the risk of
the corporate purchaser not paying its bills, the supplier can take out
credit insurance: indeed without such cover, the supplier is less
likely to provide the goods needed by the larger corporation – creating
a dangerous situation that can cause the collapse of the larger
corporations themselves. In other words, the supply chain and
distribution systems are creaking and showing early signs of a
potential to seize up. On 29th November, the insurance group Amlin,
which is estimated to own about 4% of the UK credit insurance market,
was reported likewise to be pulling out of the credit insurance market,
having reportedly decided not to write any new policies for businesses
supplying goods to other businesses on credit.
These
insurance firms are clearly anticipating increased losses from payouts.
Atradius is said to be aiming to reduce its overall exposure to risk in
the United Kingdom by about 7%, compared with a projected 5% reduction
of its exposures to the business credit market in the rest of the
world. However should the gradient of the economic downturn continue to
steepen at its present rate, pointing straight into a depression,
thanks to the ongoing criminal sabotage, we would expect such credit
risk exposures to be cut back much more sharply after the turn of the
year.
•
The above observations were prepared on 30th
November. On 2nd December, Alan Duncan, the Shadow Business Secretary
('Conservative' Party), authored an article in The Financial Times in
which, in true socialist fashion, he called for the state to underwrite
'vital insurance cover to stop the credit crunch [sic] precipitating
the collapse of supply chains'.
.............................................................................................
BRITAIN AND AMERICA ON THE BRINK OF A DEPRESSION
Which
brings us to a pressingly critical point. Thanks to the criminal
activities of the holders of the highest offices in the United States,
Britain and Germany, to name the very worst offenders, both the United
States and Britain are now hovering on the brink of a real DEPRESSION,
with General Motors effectively bankrupt in the United States and
numerous corporations and well-known names such as Woolworths in the
United Kingdom going to the wall in a frenetic cascade that is being
accompanied by steepening declines in consumer confidence and purchases
in recent weeks.
Paul Volcker, who will
certainly serve as Mr Obama’s most prestigious economic adviser beyond
the special rôle that he has accepted, told a conference convened
by
Lombard Street Research in London on 17th November that the economic
slump has begun to spread after a shocking collapse in output over the
two months to mid-November, threatening to overwhelm the incoming Obama
Administration as it struggles to restore confidence.
‘What this
crisis reveals’, Mr Volcker said, ‘is a broken financial system like no
other in my lifetime. Normal monetary policy is not able to get money
flowing. The trouble is that, even with all this [government]
protection [sic], the market is not moving again’.
In an
appropriate oblique criticism of his successor as Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Board, the criminal operative, arrested in June 2007,
Dr Alan Greenspan, Mr Volcker elaborated that ‘there has been
leveraging in the economy beyond imagination, and nobody [at the time]
was saying we need to do something’. Mr Volcker also blamed what he
called ‘the new means of credit alchemy that led bankers to slice and
dice mortgage debt into packages that disguised risk’.
THE DERIVATIVES CRISIS = THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CRISIS
Actually,
none of the ‘downstream’ slicers and dicers, including Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, had or have any recourse to the sole source of funds,
namely the mortgager. The ONLY party with true recourse is the original
mortgage bank.
Therefore, ALL ‘downstream’, repackaged,
collectivised, securitised so-called derivative ‘assets’ are fraudulent
and are worth zero, a fact of life recognised by the regional Federal
Reserve Banks, we understand, and which is a source of tension between
them and the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York.
In our forthcoming paper on this subject, we will
provide further proof that the derivatives are all worth zero, which is
the CENTRAL ISSUE. The only authoritative (that is, internationally
approved) derivatives aggregate data are the numbers published by the
Bank for International Settlements, reproduced and elaborated by the
International Monetary Fund, for instance in its October 2008 Global
Financial Stability Report subtitled ‘Financial Stress and
Deleveraging: Macrofinancial Implications and Policy’, made available
in the Press Room at the IMF/World Bank Group Annual meetings held in
October in Washington DC.
Both
sources adjust the data, on an estimated basis, for double-counting
(2). According to these sources, the notional value of outstanding
adjusted global over-the-counter derivatives contracts had expanded
from $257,894 billion at the end of 2004, to $596,004 billion by the
end of December 2007. The most recent figure cited (applicable to
around mid-October 2008) was $667 trillion.
But the underlying gross market
values of these outstanding contracts rose from just $9,377 billion at
the end of December 2004, to $14,522 billion by the end of 2007.
Thus,
whereas the gross market values of outstanding contracts were ‘worth’
3.6% of their notional values at the end of 2004, the equivalent
proportion three years later was 2.4%.
But such assessments
are in fact meaningless because, as noted above, these exotic 'derived'
instruments are, by definition, marketed WITHOUT RECOURSE to the
underlying source of real funds, which means that the derived ‘assets’
are fundamentally fraudulent.
If the morgager does default, the
only party that can ever know about the default is the original
mortgage bank. The 'downstream' parties never get to know about it, and
AREN'T INTERESTED.
It used to be the case that maximum
derivatives leveraging possible in the United Kingdom was 10:1. Earlier
this year, leveraging operations of 30:1 were being reported from
London, and the large US financial criminal enterprises are believed
until recently, at least, to have favoured mad leveraging ratios as
extended as 40:1.
This
would theoretically enable Citibank, for instance, to convert $306
billion in quick succession to $12,240 billion. However all such
proceeds would have to be stashed away off-balance sheet, are adjudged
now to be dubious, and cannot be surreptitiously transferred onto the
balance sheet, under the Basel-II settlement, given the necessity for
the disclosure of source of funds – and the crucial, little-mentioned,
factor that auditors’ fears of being sued for misrepresentation, and
more generally for their own survival given what has happened to some
of their peers, mean that they are no longer susceptible to condoning
‘smoke and mirrors’ treatments of clients' accounts.
BUSH PEOPLE STILL PUSHING FRAUDULENT FINANCE TRADES
In
the face of the reality that the perpetrators of these fraudulent
finance operations have been found out, it is STILL the case that Bush
Sr. and his few remaining cronies have been continuing, or attempting
to persist with, ‘business as usual’, looking for counterparties for
exotic trades.
Most such prospective parties have long since
realised that Bush-linked associates are criminal operatives: so, as
indicated, searching for counterparties, even in Dubai which is now in
financial trouble, has been proving a problem. The fact that these
people are STILL persisting with this behaviour shows how brainlessly
bovine and set in their criminal ways they remain.
One of the
lessons that astute counterparties around the world will or ought to
have learned by now is that the Bush-linked criminal Octopus, being by
far the most ruthless and reckless cabal of criminal financial
operatives in human history, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, turns on their
collaborators on the basis of the standard, crude ‘bait and switch’
double-cross technique that they were taught at intelligence school.
That was what happened, of course, with Iraq.
But
although we have publicised the fact that one purpose of the invasion
of Iraq was to ransack the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold,
currency and other assets and acquire control over Rafidain Bank and
thus over its sub-accounts in London, believed to hold fiat assets
worth an estimated $100 trillion, the deeper reason for the second
invasion has not hitherto been divulged.
...................................................................................................
THE U.S. TREASURY PLATES SHIPPED TO THE USSR IN 1944
Some
time in 1944, a US aircraft supposedly (but see below) crashed in
Siberia. A certain Soviet KGB officer operating in the United States,
one Colonel Kotikov, referred to this aircraft within the hearing of at
least one US military officer, as ‘the money plane’. When questioned by
the US officer as to the meaning of the phrase ‘the money plane’,
Colonel Kotikov explained that the US Treasury was shipping engraved
printing plates and related banknote printing materials to the Soviets
so that they could start to print the same ‘occupation money’ for
distribution in occupied Germany as the United States was printing for
the same purpose.
As
a Master Printer (because we own a small printing works), the Editor of
this service knows only too well that there is ONE cast-iron rule in
the printing trade: NEVER release the printing plates.
They
are ‘tools of the trade’ and represent components that have to be
manufactured in order to print the copies, which is what the customer
buys. The customer does not purchase the tools from which the copies
were manufactured: just the copies. What the US Treasury SHOULD have
done was to print German occupation money for the Soviets, and ship
them the currency itself.
•
Unless, that is, this was a component of a deep-cover US economic
warfare operation.
But
unbelievably, the US Treasury shipped not only the engraved printing
plates, but also coloured inks, varnish, tint blocks, sample paper and
other components, in two shipments conveyed to the USSR via five C-47s.
The shipments were arranged at the highest level in Washington, DC,
with the planes loaded up at National Airport.
The Soviets
then proceeded to print the new marks that their part of occupied
Germany needed, which the United States redeemed, with no
accountability whatsoever, to the gross amount of $250 million, a
colossal sum in those days.
The Soviet official who had
repeatedly agitated for the US authorities to send Treasury printing
plates to Moscow, was Andrei Gromyko (Katz), who was then Soviet
Ambassador to Washington. If Washington had meant to wage economic
warfare (possibly by supplying the Soviets with slightly doctored
printing plates so that Soviet print runs could be distinguished from
the equivalent mark notes printed by or for the US Military
Administration), this operation appears to have backfired.
Soviet
Military Intelligence (GRU) maintained unhealthily close links at the
very heart of the US Government of the day, via Alger Hiss and Harry
Dexter White. A published US Department of State Memorandum dated 14th
April 1944 of a telephone conversation between Henry Morgenthau, the US
Treasury Secretary and a Mr James Clement Dunn, of the State
Department, entitled ‘Duplicate plates to be furnished to the Soviet
Union’ indicated that the five C-47s finally left National Airport on
24th May 1944. Mr Gromyko even demanded a replacement consignment,
after one of the planes had crashed (see above); and the US authorities
never queried his ‘information’, sending a plane with a ‘replacement’
consignment of printing plates and materials to the USSR on 7th June
1944.
In
this episode, Gromyko had insisted on obtaining US Treasury printing
plates so that the Soviets could print German occupation currency
without accountability, because the Soviets knew that the US Army would
convert such currency into US dollars (whereas the Russians, of course,
refused to redeem the same currency with roubles).
As a
consequence, every Russian mark that fell into the hands of an American
soldier or accredited civilian became a potential charge against the
Treasury of the United States. Using the materials provided by
Washington, the Russians confiscated an erstwhile Nazi printing plant
in Leipzig, deep inside the Russian Zone and therefore at a safe
distance from American inspection, and started up the machinery. By
December 1946, the US Military Government had found that it had
redeemed US dollars to the value of at least 2,500,000,000 marks in
excess of the total value of occupation marks issued by its Finance
Office. Oh, and the Soviets never paid an invoice for $18,102.84
rendered by the US Treasury to cover the cost of the engraving plates
and the materials delivered in 1944.
PRECEDENT SET FOR U.S. PLATES DELIVERED BY BUSH TO SADDAM
Why
have we apparently diverged with this historical account of how the
Soviets bilked the United States for $250 million in 1944-46? Because a
similar operation was apparently perpetrated in Iraq. Only this time
round, engraved printing plates were reportedly made available to
Saddam Hussein by George H. W. Bush Sr., the arrogant, criminal
representative of the DVD who thought he was so powerful that, as late
as around 2004, he could even tell members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
to ‘go take a flying [expletive deleted] at the moon’.
If the
motive for delivering US Treasury printing plates (whether officially
authorised or not) to the Iraqi régime of Saddam Hussein in any
way
replicated the pattern of the 1944-46 scamming ruse, the objective
underlying this treachery will have been to impose a drain on the US
Treasury through the redemption of Iraqi dinars into US dollars, which
could then be pocketed by US operatives.
It
is suspected, therefore, that among the cynical ‘Black’ motives for the
invasion of Iraq, and the consequent murder and displacement of around
2,000,000 people, not to mention the thousands of US and Allied
military personnel and those 100+ 'special operatives' who raided the
Central Bank of Iraq and were then grouped together so as to be
deliberately bombarded by deadly US weaponry in a contrived 'friendly
fire' operation, will have been the familiar one, repeated in other
contexts in this murky background, of protecting the part of criminal
DVD operative George Bush Sr.’s anatomy that he uses for sitting upon.
Bush's 'rogue' US monetary printing plates had to be retrieved.
ATTEMPT TO INSTAL A CAMERA OUTSIDE OUR OFFICE EXPOSED
On
Tuesday 11th November, a visitor to the Editor’s London office noticed
that a camera, sprouting several antennae, had been erected on a tall
street lighting lamp post located immediately opposite our office
building. Earlier, when the Editor had left the building to run certain
errands in Victoria Street, he had noticed at least half a dozen men
and two big Westminster City Council vehicles, one with a hydraulic
lift, parked adjacent to the lamp post, engaged in complex activity
focused upon the street lighting. The Editor deliberately reported this
matter later via our monitored telephone lines and then, with his
visitor, stood outside in the pavement looking at the camera from
various angles, before we repaired to a nearby hostelry for some
refreshments.
•
The
camera remained in situ, as viewed from the upper storeys of our
building, as late as midnight that evening. By 9.15am the following
morning, it had been removed.
On Wednesday 12th November, the
Editor began a series of telephone calls to Westminster City Council,
with a view to obtaining some explanation for the erection and
overnight removal of the camera and antennae overlooking our office.
After innumerable attempts to extract a coherent explanation, and
having left various voicemail messages expressing our dismay at this
behaviour, the Editor finally had to inform the Personal Assistant to
the Chief Executive of Westminster City Council, asking for an urgent
response. Whereupon he was inundated with responses, culminating in the
following explanation by Patrick Allen, a senior Council executive
(paraphrase) in answer to our questions: Who authorised the camera?
What was its purpose? What budget financed it?:
‘We
are testing equipment. The major supplier, British Telecom Plc, is late
with its deliveries of hardware. But the lesser suppliers have
delivered in accordance with their contracts and have submitted their
invoices and want to be paid. The intended system cannot be installed
until the British Telecom equipment has been supplied. So we have been
testing the equipment provided by the smaller suppliers, to verify that
it is fit for purpose. The crew would have erected the camera to test
it and would then have removed it once the test was complete’. In
answer to the comment that the camera was mysteriously removed
overnight, Mr Allen said: ‘That’s quite possible. The crews start at
7.00am in the morning’.
Who are we to argue with this very
rapidly provided official explanation for the fact that a camera,
complete with numerous antennae, was suddenly erected and focused at
our office building and then abruptly removed overnight, after we had
reported this matter by telephone and indicated our curiosity by being
photographed looking at the camera from all angles in the street?
APPENDIX:
THE
EARLY ATTEMPT BY THE DVD-ORIENTED COMPONENT OF MI6 TO PUT A STOP TO THE
EDITOR’S INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FINANCIAL CORRUPTION. IT HAD THE REVERSE
EFFECT:
The following sequence, published on pages F-05 to F-08
of International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, distributed worldwide
at the end of November 2008, references conversations between the
veteran journalist, Gordon Thomas, who boasted of close intelligence
connections, and the Editor of this service, in 2004-2005, in which
Gordon Thomas warned or threatened the Editor that certain elements
ostensibly of UK intelligence had borne false witness against the
Editor of this service by disseminating fatuous fabrications about the
Editor’s supposed links to Mark Thatcher and Bernie Ecclestone, neither
of whom the Editor has ever met and with whom he has never had anything
to do, not least because your very own correspondent has done nothing
at all in his working life since returning from Canada in 1961 except
write and publish, and provide consultancy services, on his own
account. This is a full-time 24/7 occupation which allows of no
respite, especially as nowadays we also publish (and the Editor writes)
books.
•
So whoever dreamed up this tripe didn’t do his homework.
However
given the huge momentum of the exposures, which have 'blown' this
fraudulent finance and the involvement of criminal enterprise
institutions and intelligence cadres in its perpetration, while
exposing the rôles of DVD, Dachau, CIA-1, Frankfurt, Government
Operations – 2 (GO-2), DVD chieftain George Bush Sr. and the other
criminal elements who have been disturbing the peace of humanity and
creating flashpoints around the world (such as in Bombay) to cover up
their financial crimes, it would appear that elements of British
intelligence later changed their opinion of what the Editor was
attempting to achieve. At all events, their early intimidation
operation fell flat.
This
demonstrates the wisdom, perhaps, of walking in a straight line when
investigating and exposing evil, since parties who zigzag cannot keep
up with those who forge straight ahead.
The relevant passages
from the latest issue of our financial journal, referencing
conversations with Gordon Thomas, are as follows:
In the
course of the conversation [in Bath, on that occasion], the question of
MI6 and British intelligence interest in certain topics arose. It was
in this context that the veteran journalist revealed that MI6 had
informed him personally that your correspondent is or was involved with
Mark Thatcher in connection with the botched coup to seize power and
the oil assets in Equatorial Guinea. Observing Thomas’s own
astonishment at this curious invention, your correspondent asked when
he had heard ‘this nonsense about [my non-existent connection with]
Mark Thatcher’.
At
first he said that ‘oh, it was very recent, within the past two
months’. (However in a telephone conversation on 19th November 2004,
Gordon Thomas, who has close MI6 connections, shortened this time-frame
to ‘within the past two weeks’, before correcting himself and saying
that it may have been ‘within the past two months’. A bit hazy, he was).
Mr
Thomas elaborated that his MI6 source(s) had reacted as follows when
the Editor’s name had come up in conversation: ‘Oh yes, we know about
him. Why revive him?’
We take this to be a reference to the
fact that the Editor had published his early findings about this
corruption in Volume 28, Number 4 of this service, back in March 2003.
That issue alluded to, and illustrated some of, the ‘smoking gun’
financial payout documents made available to the Editor in June 2002.
In other words, MI6 thought we had fallen asleep.
Separately,
a Pentagon-linked operative had approached the Editor about some scam
involving Bernie Ecclestone, a character with a murky background,
explaining that he had been told (by MI6, it transpired) that the
Editor had some involvement with this motor racing fellow, also a pack
of lies. Both the Ecclestone and Thatcher fables were 'supposedly'
fabricated by MI6.
GORDON THOMAS SPILLS THE BEANS
On later
telephoning Gordon Thomas, in order to thank him for his time and
hospitality on the preceding afternoon, your correspondent made his
deduction of the link clear to him:
Editor: ‘It’s obvious that this mad fantasy about links with Mark
Thatcher and the separate nonsense about Bernie Ecclestone comes from
the same source, namely MI6’.
Gordon Thomas (as though he knew more than he was revealing): ‘That’s
right’.
Editor: ‘Who did you obtain this [Mark Thatcher libel] tripe from:
were they high-up sources?’
Gordon Thomas: ‘I heard this very recently….Yes, one of them is [a
high-up source]'.
I would describe the other as middle management’.
Editor:
‘So what makes them do something like this? What drives them to make up
such ludicrous stories and lies, when they know they can’t make
anything stick’ (since the whole pack of lies is a crude and clumsy
invention)?
Gordon Thomas: [paraphrase]: ‘It’s not necessary for
them to prove anything. All they need to do is to make allegations.
That’s all they need to do’.
Editor: ‘So, what have they done with these lies?
Have they put these inventions out there to the press?’
Gordon Thomas: ‘Yes, it’s with the press, I understand’.
Gordon
Thomas then proceeded in general terms to summarise the false story
that MI6 had fed to the press about the Editor’s alleged (but totally
non-existent) connections with Mark Thatcher and the failed Equatorial
Guinea fiasco. In other words, MI6 were attempting to connect the
Editor to this episode, of which of course the Editor know absolutely
nothing except what we have read in the open press and on the Internet.
Editor: ‘Of course if any such allegations were to appear in print I
would go to court at once. Presumably they realise that’.
The
Editor reiterated that if any such false allegations were to be made in
the press, he would go to court given that the suggestions are
fabrications with no basis whatsoever in the real world. The Editor
spends all of his time (24/7) preparing serials and books for
publication; and as all who know him are aware, has no time for any
other work activity of any kind, as has been the case since 1969.
Gordon
Thomas then alluded to the fact that the newspapers concerned would
have done their homework and would find that they could make no
progress since there would be no connections to be unravelled;
whereupon he said that it would not have been necessary for there to
have been any substance to MI6’s lies: all that would be necessary to
discredit the Editor in the eyes of the media would be to put this pack
of lies ‘out there’.
FALSE WITNESS LIES, SO THAT THE ‘MAINSTREAM’ WOULD IGNORE IT
The
motive would have been to ‘guarantee’ that if International Currency
Review were ever to publish any information which might reveal serial
official corruption on either side of the Atlantic or anywhere else,
the British press would pay no attention (as has hitherto been the
case). It was a classic intelligence frame-up.
In further conversation between the Editor and the veteran journalist,
Gordon Thomas, it was carefully explained to the Editor that
[paraphrase]:
•
British
and American intelligence are now so incestuously intertwined, and the
foreign policy stances of the two Governments ditto, that there is
hardly any difference between them.
•
(No mention of DVD and Mossad, you notice: Ed.).
•
A
new second-term Bush Administration had been ‘elected’ on 2nd November
and was anxious that ALL its requirements across the board would be
complied with by the British authorities, as appropriate, in line with
its familiar arrogant approach to the ‘Special Relationship’.
[In
the same issue, on pages 41-58, we demonstrated conclusively that the
2004 election, like the election of 2000, was stolen, and we showed in
part how this was done].
•
It had been explained to the
veteran journalist, Gordon Thomas, by MI6, that Washington had
basically been pressurising them to ‘do something about Mr Story’. When
your correspondent asked why on earth this was considered ‘necessary’,
the veteran journalist continued [paraphrase]:
•
‘They
think you may be dangerous* because you have the documents and you have
control of publications through which information about the financial
documents can be disseminated’.
[*Dangerous for what reason?
Because we would be liable to expose their nasty corruption, their
double-dealing, their open-ended abuse of power, and their treason, by
any chance?]
Editor: ‘But they know perfectly well that others
have these compromising financial documents…’. [The Editor then
mentioned his knowledge that the editor of a prominent publication
(Vanity Fair) held copies of the documents in the folder obtained by
the Editor in Washington in June 2002].
Gordon Thomas: ‘Yes, but he probably can’t use them, or else is too
frightened to do so (accurate: Editor), whereas you can, because the
publications you publish are under your direct control’.
Editor:
‘So you are saying that MI6 know that there isn’t a controlling
intelligence cell sitting in our ‘press room’, as is the case
elsewhere, and are collaborating with the crude Forces of Darkness in
Washington who want these financial scandals to remain covered up
indefinitely, are you?’
Gordon Thomas: ‘In so many words, that’s
what is intended, yes. And here’s what they said. They said: Tell Mr
Story about what has happened to’ [adding the name of a well-known UK
journalist who stepped out of line. The name of this journalist is
known to the Editor]’. This was a threat to surface some wholly
concocted ‘sleaze’ report about the Editor.
Gordon Thomas then
explained that his MI6 contact(s) referred to photographs of this
journalist stripped naked and indulging in some kind of satanic sexual
orgy. He then added: ‘They are saying that if you expose these
documents, or if they think you are going to do so, they will do
everything in their power to discredit you. That way, when you
publicise the damning information that you possess, no-one will believe
you and the press will take no notice’. ATTEMPTED BLACKMAIL.
The
second part of prediction has proved accurate. The press took no
notice: but not because of the lies peddled by the criminal
organisation calling itself MI6 (or was Gordon Thomas speaking on
behalf of Mossad by any chance?), but actually because the ‘mainstream
media’ didn’t keep up with events, didn’t do its due diligence, and was
all too easily bamboozled by the spooks who fed them redirection
‘slides’ about the ‘cause’ of the problem being ‘sub-prime’ mortgages,
which have of course existed ever since mortgages were first thought
of. The ‘mainstream’ bought this bromide, and went to sleep for a year.
Consequently, the UK ‘mainstream media’, found wanting
and caught short, have since been scrambling to ‘catch up’ with the
unravelling Octopus scandal, with no reliable bearings to guide them.
We cannot tell whether or not they ignored the evidence we have
published since March 2003, on the basis (according to Gordon Thomas’s
assessment) of a farrago of concocted rubbish about the Editor which
has never even surfaced, despite these threats. They did not even
amount to blackmail, because there was nothing in the lies to blackmail
the Editor with. However Gordon Thomas behaved disgracefully in
allowing himself to be used for this low purpose. Shame on you.
Naturally,
the Editor exposed this clumsy attempted frame-up by publishing the
complete narrative (on pages 27-39 of Volume 30, Numbers 2 & 3
[known as ‘The Green Book’)].
The BLACKMAIL AND FALSE WITNESS ‘warning’ sequence is concluded:
Editor:
‘This is all going rather further than the previous baseless
allegations. Those were so absurd as to be almost demented: anyone who
knows me is aware that I do nothing else, 24/7, but prepare our
publications for press. How could I have time to mess about with this
fellow Bernie Ecclestone, whom I have never met and would never wish to
meet, in Monte Carlo, fooling around with motor cars which I know
nothing at all about and in which I have never been interested; or with
Mark Thatcher, whom I have never met or spoken to either, in some dark
corner of Africa?’
‘When
would I have time to do any of that, and why do they think I am so
pushed for money that I would be tempted by such stupidity? In any case
I never invest in anyone else’s ventures: only in my own, not least
because I have no time for any other activity. If these stupid idiots
had done their homework, they would know this: after all, I have been
doing precisely the same thing since the 1960s, and our financial
publications are well known in the global banking sector after all
these decades. Furthermore our London offices are only round the
corner: these people have feet.
They can walk…’.
Gordon
Thomas: ‘Oh they wouldn’t do that. They’d have your telephones bugged.
They listen to your phone calls. Why would they expose themselves? They
want to expose you’.
Editor [thinking: Well, they have just exposed themselves, through you,
Mister]:
‘If
they are so very desperate, why don’t they liquidate me, like they have
liquidated others, this being evidently one of their favourite
pastimes? If they think I am so likely to expose their corruption, why
don’t they just do that?’
Gordon Thomas: ‘Oh, they wouldn’t do that. it would be far too messy’.
Editor:
(unspoken): ‘Oh, so the only reason they ‘wouldn’t do that’ is that it
would be far too messy. So, if it wasn’t ‘far too messy’, they would,
would they? They made a pretty messy job of poor Dr Kelly’ [the British
microbiologist who, like more than 300 of his scientific colleagues
around the world, have died mysteriously and violently in recent years
because of their knowledge of secret population-reduction biological
warfare technology that is being developed in order to rid the world,
Himmler-style, of ‘undesirables’, and in Dr Kelly’s case, almost
certainly because he knew about the clandestine operation orchestrated
by the Bush/DVD apparat to equip Iran with nuclear materials. Dr Kelly
was found ‘suicided’ in an Oxfordshire wood in 2003. His body was moved
and the related cover-up appears to be unravelling right now, along
with everything else.
[INSERTION:
It is believed that the ‘triple gunshot warning’ that the Editor
received in September 2008 [see Report, 21st September 2008] reflected
a belief that we might reveal information about delivery of such
materials, along with little girls, drugs and arms, using DVD-supplied
submarines].
Editor:
(spoken: paraphrase): ‘In revealing their dirty little hands like this,
they are exposing themselves, which strikes me as being extremely dumb
of them. They have shown their hand, thereby indicating to me that any
exposure of these evils is indeed greatly to be feared, which signals
to me loud and clear that it is all the more urgently necessary’.
Anyway,
as a direct consequence of this clumsy early 'MI6' (according to Gordon
Thomas: but was it?) intervention, the Editor was further encouraged to
continue his enquiries. The correct way to have dealt with their
‘little problem’ would have been for someone from the intelligence
services to have made an appointment to come to the Editor’s office
across the River Thames, and to have appealed to the Editor on the
basis of the old standards of gentlemanly honour. Sorry, we forgot:
these people aren’t ‘gentlemen’ any longer. So they blow their cover,
instead....(...)
Archive of NEWS Announcements arranged in date order
03 Dec 2008 WASHINGTON EXPOSED AS SECRETLY FINANCING AL-QAEDA
25 Nov 2008 WHITEHALL COULD RAISE £100+++ BILLION WITH NO PAIN
20 Nov 2008 BRITAIN'S WAY OUT OF CRISIS: STOP PAYING THE E.U.
17 Nov 2008 ‘WHY ARE WE IN AFGHANISTAN?’ QUESTION UNANSWERED
31 Oct 2008 BLAIR HAS ‘ROLLED OVER’ TO AVOID ARREST AND JAIL
26 Oct 2008 THE CORRUPT OCTOPUS HAS BEEN SEVERELY WOUNDED
11 Oct 2008 GERMAN FINANCE MINISTER AMBUSHED OVER SETTLEMENTS
02 Oct 2008 NEW DIRECTORY OF WORLD REVOLUTIONARY OPERATIONS...
27 Sep 2008 SECONDARY SAUSAGES FROM THE D.C. SAUSAGE MACHINE
23 Sep 2008 LATEST FALSE PROSPECTUS FROM 'PAULSON'S' TREASURY
21 Sep 2008 UPDATE: THE RECENT GUNSHOT AND OTHER THREATS
20 Sep 2008 OPERATIONS OF DVD, DACHAU AGAINST THE 'MAIN ENEMY'
18 Sep 2008 FUHRER MAY TRY TO ESCAPE VIA A STATE OF EMERGENCY
18 Sep 2008 MICHAEL C. COTTRELL'S U.S. FINANCIAL REFORM PROPOSALS
30 Aug 2008 BUSH 41, CLINTON 42, BUSH 43 ARE PAID OUT, THEN RENEGE
27 Aug 2008 ACT ONE OF DIE MEISTERSCHWINDLERN ENDS THIS WEEK
19 Aug 2008 U.S. MILITARY TO BUSH: WE WILL NOT ALLOW A WAR
18 Aug 2008 UPROAR IN D.C. OVER OUR REPORT DATED 16TH AUGUST
16 Aug 2008 PUTIN: PAY ME BY MONDAY OR I OWN THE PIPELINE + GEORGIA
14 Aug 2008 PUTIN DEMANDS HIS $30 BILLION, OR HE BROADENS THE WAR
12 Aug 2008 SETTLEMENT FUNDS SCAMMED DAILY, PUT BACK AT 4.00PM
22 Jul 2008 U.S. FINANCIAL MARKET REVAMP IS FALSE PROSPECTUS
15 Jul 2008 CONFIRMED: TWO COUNTRIES SEEKING U.S. COLLAPSE
12 Jul 2008 CRISIS INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW IS PUBLISHED
27 Jun 2008 CLINTON, BROWN & MERKEL NOW IN EYE OF THE STORM
25 Jun 2008 BUSH, CHENEY, BROWN COMPROMISED OVER SETTLEMENTS
20 Jun 2008 COUNTRY PAYEES 'RECEIVING U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES'
18 Jun 2008 BUSH, CHENEY AT CENTRE OF HUGE CORRUPTION STORM
15 Jun 2008 WHY WE CLOSED DOWN WANTAGATE: BRIEFLY EXPLAINED
10 Jun 2008 IRELAND HAS BEEN 'ENRONISED', MAY THEREFORE VOTE 'NO'
06 Jun 2008 25% REPORTED CREAMED OFF THE TOP OF SETTLEMENTS
04 Jun 2008 THE LONDON POLICE RAIDS AND THE INTELLIGENCE WAR
03 Jun 2008 BRITISH POLICE RAID PRIVATE SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES
26 May 2008 HOW BUSH, CHENEY RIPPED OFF THE CIA AND THE PENTAGON
17 May 2008 CATASTROPHIC U.S. ERRORS CASTIGATED BY BUCHANAN
15 May 2008 MADAME WU DEMANDS U.S.TREASURY PAYMENT TODAY
09 May 2008 REFINANCING THE WORLD AND REFLOATING THE U.S. DOLLAR
17 Apr 2008 GLOBAL REFINANCING SETTLEMENTS INTELLIGENCE UPDATE
12 Apr 2008 G-7 DEMANDS IMMEDIATE U.S. DISCIPLINE AND COMPLIANCE
01 Apr 2008 EXPOSED FINANCIAL FRAUDS ARE FORETOLD IN SCRIPTURE
18 Mar 2008 THE WANTA PLAN'S DEALS WILL BE 100% TRANSPARENT
07 Mar 2008 ‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’: HILLARY RUNNING THE MONEY
06 Mar 2008 THE LATEST DIVERSIONARY ATTACK ON LEO WANTA
03 Mar 2008 WANTAGATE OBFUSCATION: ‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’
25 Feb 2008 BUSH ON THE COUCH: VERDICT OF DR JUSTIN FRANK
14 Feb 2008 U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS PRESIDENT BUSH TO PAY
11 Feb 2008 UPDATED: EMBARGO SANCTIONS TOOK EFFECT NOON EST
10 Feb 2008 EXTREME CRISIS AS GROUP OF 9 DEMAND SETTLEMENT
09 Feb 2008 G-8 WARNS AMERICA OF THE SEVEREST CONSEQUENCES
05 Feb 2008 CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: A HILLARY 'BLACK OP'
03 Feb 2008 CLINTON PARDONS EXPOSED UNDERWORLD CONNECTIONS
27 Jan 2008 ARE THE 'PAYOUTS' BEING HIJACKED IN REAL TIME?
25 Jan 2008 LEE WANTA'S SETTLEMENT IS NOW 18 MONTHS++ OVERDUE
22 Jan 2008 DID BROWN BOTHER TO READ THE LISBON E.U. TREATY?
11 Jan 2008 BUSH CRIMINAL OPERATION TO SABOTAGE BASEL II
09 Jan 2008 PAULSON DIVERSION MASKED THEFT OF $44+ TRILLION
05 Jan 2008 GLOBAL DATA THEFT OPERATION BY THE CRIMINAL CADRES
02 Jan 2008 HENRY PAULSON HAS DIED AFTER BEING SHOT IN THE CHEST
.........................................................................................................................
26 Dec 2007 ‘SUBPRIME’ ‘SLIDE’ THAT MASKS FRAUDULENT FINANCE
19 Dec 2007 WARRING ISRAELI INTEL THREATENS RUBIN WITH DEATH
13 Dec 2007 'BUSH SR. WILL BE SHOT DEAD IF CAUGHT STEALING AGAIN'
10 Dec 2007 CITIBANK BOARD MEETING TO DISGORGE WANTA’S FUNDS
08 Dec 2007 WHITE HOUSE ORDERS CONTACT WITH STORY TO CEASE
02 Dec 2007 U.S. JUDGE ISSUES A WARRANT FOR PAULSON’S ARREST
29 Nov 2007 STALLING FOR TIME WITH THE SAME OLD INTEL LIES
28 Nov 2007 BUSH SR WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’ WHEN WANTA CALLED AT BANK
26 Nov 2007 PAULSON HAS SWINDLED TAXPAYERS FOR 18 MONTHS
22 Nov 2007 ADMINISTRATION BYPASSES CONGRESS AND THE BUDGET
21 Nov 2007 WANTA'S TAX $1.575 DIVIDED UP WITHOUT THE PAYOUT
20 Nov 2007 CITIBANK NOW DEFIES THE FED, TREASURY AND STATE
18 Nov 2007 IS PROVOST MARSHAL COVERING UP 9/11 COMPLICITY?
15 Nov 2007 EDITOR THREATENED BY TERRIFIED U.S. OPERATIVES
13 Nov 2007 THE PROVOST MARSHAL MAY NOW BE A CO-CONSPIRATOR
11 Nov 2007 THE PROVOST MARSHAL MAY RESORT TO MARTIAL LAW
09 Nov 2007 U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT LIES THAT WANTA HAS BEEN PAID
06 Nov 2007 ENTIRE CITIBANK BOARD BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN ARRESTED
01 Nov 2007 PROVOST MARSHAL IS NOW INVOLVED IN WANTA SCANDAL
27 Oct 2007 MISPRISION OF FELONY LETTER TO WISCONSIN JUDGE
25 Oct 2007 BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH, FROM EACH OTHER
24 Oct 2007 CYNICAL DISINFORMATION ON THE WANTA SETTLEMENT
04 Oct 2007 CITIBANK'S BLUFF IS CALLED: IT HOLDS LEO WANTA'S FUNDS
30 Sep 2007 LEO WANTA’S MANDAMUS PETITION DULY SABOTAGED, BUT…
20 Sep 2007 PAULSON INVOKES THE ‘FULL FAITH AND CREDIT’ HE TRASHED
17 Sep 2007 WANTA $$ EMBEZZLED BY AGENTS FOR CLINTON, CHENEY
08 Sep 2007 WORLD CRASH PREFERRED TO THE WANTA SETTLEMENT?
30 Aug 2007 HOW WANTAGATE TRIGGERED THE 'SUB-PRIME' CRISIS
10 Aug 2007 PREDICTED GLOBAL CRISIS: OBFUSCATED DIAGNOSIS
09 Aug 2007 MANDAMUS COURT SUMMONSES + RETURNS OF SERVICE
06 Aug 2007 WANTAGATE: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF ‘WISCONSINGATE’
01 Aug 2007 WANTAGATE, QUEENGATE AND THE CIA’S JOHN BOLTON
30 Jul 2007 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON STEALS WANTA’S FUNDS
27 Jul 2007 GLOBAL ‘TRAIN WRECK’ ERUPTS ON CUE, AS PREDICTED
18 Jul 2007 TOUCH AND GO: WANTA SETTLEMENT OR WORLD CRASH
13 Jul 2007 BANKS, CRIMINALS, WORLD, IN CHAOS OVER WANTAGATE
07 Jul 2007 WANTA FUNDS SWITCHED FOR PRIVATE GAIN – AGAIN
05 Jul 2007 LEO WANTA'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
05 Jul 2007 FORMER BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR ARRESTED
24 Jun 2007 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FILED IN ALEXANDRIA
17 Jun 2007 SIR LEO WANTA REJECTS FALSE SETTLEMENT SCHEME
11 Jun 2007 THE WANTAGATE LISTING OF INSTITUTION DIRECTORS
02 Jun 2007 MR BUSH SETS OUT TO BAMBOOZLE THE GROUP OF EIGHT
15 May 2007 LET'S KICK THE AMERICAN AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON
13 May 2007 THE RULE OF LAW VS. THE RULE OF THE JUNGLE
05 May 2007 ‘ACT OF WAR’ BY THE UNITED STATES AGAINST THE UK
04 May 2007 WANTAGATE: NEW CHENEY-STYLE DIRTY TRICKS FOR OLD
01 May 2007 WANTAGATE: ‘THE SKINNING OF THE CAT’: PART 2
22 Apr 2007 WANTAGATE: 'THE SKINNING OF THE CAT': PART 1
05 Apr 2007 WANTAGATE: GRANDFATHER OF CORRUPTION SCANDALS
27 Mar 2007 LEO WANTA REQUESTS AN FBI CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
20 Mar 2007 LEO WANTA AND THE WISCONSIN STATE TAX GESTAPO
06 Mar 2007 U.S. CROOKS PROVOKE GLOBAL ECONOMIC WARFARE
26 Feb 2007 BEARING FALSE WITNESS, LYING AND DEALING FALSELY
14 Feb 2007 BUSH CABINET SIGNS ILLEGAL COLLECTIVE DOCUMENT
10 Feb 2007 INTERNATIONAL WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF TONY BLAIR
02 Feb 2007 CHENEY BRIBES OFFICIALS TO ABORT WANTA PAYMENT
26 Jan 2007 CHENEY, PAULSON DOUBLE-CROSS THE WORLD COURT
22 Jan 2007 TREASONGATE BACKGROUND: INTEL PONZI SCAMMING
17 Jan 2007 TREASONGATE UPDATE: OUTPOURING OF SUPPORT
13 Jan 2007 TREASONGATE UPDATE: OMEGA 'PONZI GAME' SCAMS
12 Jan 2007 TREASON AND SCAMMING ORGY AT THE WHITE HOUSE
07 Jan 2007 TOP U.S. OFFICIALS: ORGANISED CRIME ALLEGATIONS
.............................................................................................................
30 Dec 2006 PAULSON ARREST UPDATE... BREAKING, MORE TO COME
19 Dec 2006 ‘NEW 9/11’ TO FABRICATE DERIVATIVES END-GAME
07 Dec 2006 SR. LOSES TRILLIONS IN NAKED SHORT MELTDOWN
03 Dec 2006 TOP U.S. OFFICIALS STEALING, STEALING, STEALING ...
29 Nov 2006 SCUFFLES IN GOLDMAN SACHS LONDON OFFICE FOYER
21 Nov 2006 PAULSON CONFLICT OF INTEREST OVER WANTA FUNDS
26 Oct 2006 THE AUTHORITATIVE LIST OF THE WANTA BANKS
02 Oct 2006 WANTA PLAN TO BE VALUED AND TAXED IN AUSTRIA
14 Sep 2006 WHITE HOUSE: 'WE'LL DO WHAT WE GODDAM PLEASE'
12 Sep 2006 URGENT WANTA PLAN DEFAULT SEQUEL & UPDATE
07 Sep 2006 EUROPEANS PLACE 'STOP ORDERS' ON $100M+ DEALS
02 Sep 2006 NEW: WANTA CRISIS UPDATE + NEW INTELLIGENCE
02 Sep 2006 NEW: HUGE GLOBAL BENEFITS OF THE WANTA PLAN
17 Aug 2006 BANKSTERS AND OFFICIALS TIGHTENING OWN NOOSE
13 Aug 2006 CRIMINAL DIVERSION OF WANTA FUNDS CONTINUES
02 Aug 2006 OVER THE CLIFF: FULL FAITH AND CREDIT DITCHED
24 Jul 2006 BUSH PREVENTS LEO WANTA PAYING TAX: A FELONY
24 Jul 2006 JOURNAL CALLS FOR THE FED TO BE NATIONALISED
20 Jul 2006 FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD IMPEDES THE WANTA PLAN
22 Jun 2006 CRUNCH TIME FOR THE BANKS AND THE CROOKS
18 Apr 2006 LEO WANTA AND THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SHOWDOWN
03 Mar 2006 WHAT NEXT FOR BRITISH BRAINWASHING OFFENSIVE?
12 Oct 2005 E.U. TREATIES PROCURED BY PAYOLA CORRUPTION